Re: Disinformation spreaders
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 1:57 pm
That is a non sequitur.ceylon2 wrote:What my book is about would only be reported to Amazon or any other outlet by the subject matter which is a fmotl.
Quatloos! The views herein are not those of Quatloosia Publishing LLC -- Legal Issues Fax to 877-698-0678 and admin issues to sooltauq [at] gmail.com
https://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/
That is a non sequitur.ceylon2 wrote:What my book is about would only be reported to Amazon or any other outlet by the subject matter which is a fmotl.
I have more posts than you freeman, but you should be able to adjust that now because 2 of your kings have a book out on them. You don't like that do youTheCoz wrote:This is obviously a blackhat/greyhat attempt at scamming someone.
He's even using a free "publishing" website to make a cover - https://www.createspace.com/
This person will be 14 years old, attempting a silly method to cash grab. Its simple really, you find a niche, post about it in forums etc, copy + paste content with a few poorly crafted sentences added by yourself and wait for someone to spend money. Rinse and repeat.
Because post count means what?ceylon2 wrote:I have more posts than you freeman, but you should be able to adjust that now because 2 of your kings have a book out on them. You don't like that do youTheCoz wrote:This is obviously a blackhat/greyhat attempt at scamming someone.
He's even using a free "publishing" website to make a cover - https://www.createspace.com/
This person will be 14 years old, attempting a silly method to cash grab. Its simple really, you find a niche, post about it in forums etc, copy + paste content with a few poorly crafted sentences added by yourself and wait for someone to spend money. Rinse and repeat.
Yes I am calling your 'work' a scam unless you want to deny the allegation that you have filled the majority of the pages of your 'work' with the judgement from Meads vs Meads which is in the public domain. I remind you again that chapter 6 of your 'work' runs from page 36 to page 320 (or possibly 314) and on page 37 you state "It is important to read the whole case..." and that page 38 is the first page of the said said Meads vs Meads judgement.ceylon2 wrote:Are you calling my work a scam? Do you realise the damage that can do to my reputation and sales of my work? Send me your details privately so I can consider any wrong doing. Or the admin may give it as an ip address.longdog wrote:Well I do find it annoying when people try to rip off consumers and that's exactly what you are trying to do. You've 'written' a book that is largely copied from public domain sources and then claimed copyright on text to which you do not hold the copyright. Then you apparently attempt to pass yourself off as an established author in an attempt to piggy back on their fame.ceylon2 wrote:Longdog you are not trying to correct anything you are simply pissed because of this book, I wonder why?
There's a word for people like you... Scammer.
What the fuck are you talking about?ceylon2 wrote:...because 2 of your kings have a book out on them. You don't like that do you
Thank you for your opinion, although you haven't read the whole book it is simply that, an opinion and makes your accusations of my work to be a scam the basis of libel against me and allowed by the forum owners.longdog wrote:Yes I am calling your 'work' a scam unless you want to deny the allegation that you have filled the majority of the pages of your 'work' with the judgement from Meads vs Meads which is in the public domain. I remind you again that chapter 6 of your 'work' runs from page 36 to page 320 (or possibly 314) and on page 37 you state "It is important to read the whole case..." and that page 38 is the first page of the said said Meads vs Meads judgement.ceylon2 wrote:Are you calling my work a scam? Do you realise the damage that can do to my reputation and sales of my work? Send me your details privately so I can consider any wrong doing. Or the admin may give it as an ip address.longdog wrote:
Well I do find it annoying when people try to rip off consumers and that's exactly what you are trying to do. You've 'written' a book that is largely copied from public domain sources and then claimed copyright on text to which you do not hold the copyright. Then you apparently attempt to pass yourself off as an established author in an attempt to piggy back on their fame.
There's a word for people like you... Scammer.
If you want to sue me for defamation then please do. You'd have to have a reputation to damage in the first place and I think my defence of truth and fair comment would prevail.
As for my IP... Don't bother the mods... 178.78.66.211
Do your worst.