Page 4 of 8

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:16 pm
by ceylon2
I regard the book as a left hook, thought you would of agreed.

Imagine it selling a million copies, hahaha well, ya never know until ya try

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:22 pm
by ceylon2
CreateSpace is trying to sell me a proof copy. Can ya believe that? I told them no thanks, why would I buy my own book, I have the transcript.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:13 am
by Burnaby49
I've had printed copies of Meads inflicted on me uncountable times. During the height of my court-reporting period I was frequently in the Federal Court of Canada registry in Vancouver going through court files. The Crown's filing invariably had a printed copy of Meads as part of their book of authorities. One file, for some unknown reason, had two copies. The court registries of Canada must have, as an accumulated total, an entire warehouse of copies of Meads stored as part of court records.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 5:46 am
by notorial dissent
Can I say seriously enough how much I don't care. We had a troll peddling a book that really isn't a book, a website that is really a sham, and pointing to another website that is basically a sham any more, and that it is all rather pointless and boring. I think it is time to lock this topic and move on to something more interesting, like what is a new good micro brew.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:29 am
by ceylon2
notorial dissent wrote:Can I say seriously enough how much I don't care. We had a troll peddling a book that really isn't a book, a website that is really a sham, and pointing to another website that is basically a sham any more, and that it is all rather pointless and boring. I think it is time to lock this topic and move on to something more interesting, like what is a new good micro brew.
I call it advertising a book by it's author rather than peddling. Using the word peddling is deliberately persuading friends, followers or subscribers to have a negative approach to the author in an attempt to persuade that friend, follower or subscriber not to buy that particular book. Then using troll (a favourite word used by fmotl) to strengthen the peddling word so that friends, followers and subscribers share elsewhere. At the same time while pushing hatred towards another. That pusher is sat behind a monitor rubbing his/her hands and sniggering while still typing how much they don't care. They also find out that the book author has a website similar to a website that he/she loves to use and will try and damage that too by calling it a sham (this type of person is also known as hypocrite). While attempting to create negative thoughts to others they will also attempt to put a halt to the author speaking out or defending themselves by throwing them out of the room, closing the door or banning them (another favourite of the fmotl), this is done so that the hypocrite or hater can keep using psychology without interference. They will then ask to move on to more interesting subjects but without a thought they simply want to carry on as top dog in the subject as what the author is doing. It's really an ego thing or jealousy or protecting the real troll. I do not know who you are on about for pedling this book whether it is ceylon2 or longdog although longdog is a friend of yours I guess it must be ceylon2
Another tactic is to attack race, colour, punctuation, language while they themselves cannot speak their own which in the uk would be the queens English.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:43 am
by notorial dissent
Semantics. I call it like I smell it.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:44 am
by SteveUK
why are you having a conversation about yourself?
I do not know who you are on about for pedling this book whether it is ceylon2 or longdog although longdog is a friend of yours I guess it must be ceylon2

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:54 am
by ceylon2
SteveUK wrote:why are you having a conversation about yourself?
I do not know who you are on about for peddling this book whether it is ceylon2 or longdog although longdog is a friend of yours I guess it must be ceylon2
It's not having a conversation about myself it's giving guidance about typical modus operandi of haters

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:59 am
by longdog
ceylon2 wrote:I call it advertising a book by it's author rather than peddling. Using the word peddling is deliberately persuading friends, followers or subscribers to have a negative approach to the author in an attempt to persuade that friend, follower or subscriber not to buy that particular book.
Your definition of 'peddling' is at odds with the dictionary.

Then using troll (a favourite word used by fmotl) to strengthen the peddling word so that friends, followers and subscribers share elsewhere. At the same time while pushing hatred towards another. That pusher is sat behind a monitor rubbing his/her hands and sniggering while still typing how much they don't care.
Your asserting that Quatloos is den of FMOTL shills is as laughable as it is pathetic.

They also find out that the book author has a website similar to a website that he/she loves to use and will try and damage that too by calling it a sham (this type of person is also known as hypocrite).


You've got that arse about face... You came here plugging your website and people noticed one of the few threads on your forum (Which has but one active member... You) is advertising your book. It took no sleuthing skills on our part.

While attempting to create negative thoughts to others they will also attempt to put a halt to the author speaking out or defending themselves by throwing them out of the room, closing the door or banning them (another favourite of the fmotl), this is done so that the hypocrite or hater can keep using psychology without interference.


Twelve hours ago you LANCB'ed "you bunch of lovely people bye fuckin bye"... https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalW ... oming_back

They will then ask to move on to more interesting subjects but without a thought they simply want to carry on as top dog in the subject as what the author is doing. It's really an ego thing or jealousy or protecting the real troll. I do not know who you are on about for pedling this book whether it is ceylon2 or longdog although longdog is a friend of yours I guess it must be ceylon2
Gibberish.

Another tactic is to attack race, colour, punctuation, language...
Nobody has attacked you for your race (which we don't know) or your colour (which we also don't know) so lay off with the martyr complex.

Moving on to the punctuation and language the criticism started, quite reasonably, with people pointing out that your claim to have studied law for three years was at odds with your standard of written English.

...while they themselves cannot speak their own which in the uk would be the queens English
What in the name of Sooty, Sweep and Sue are you talking about?

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:12 am
by JimUk1
Have you come on here purely to advertise your ebook?

Why not try and sell it at the upcoming meeting of the great minds in Nottingham?

I doubt anyone in here needs reminding what a pair of hypocrites Ceylon and Witterick are.

In fact Jon was given column inches in the Gaurdiun (The Guardian) in which he was throughly slated by rational people.

I would have though that would be enough alone for people to take note, yet alone even write a book and try and sell it for £15.00!

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... es-economy

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:23 am
by ceylon2
longdog wrote:
ceylon2 wrote:I call it advertising a book by it's author rather than peddling. Using the word peddling is deliberately persuading friends, followers or subscribers to have a negative approach to the author in an attempt to persuade that friend, follower or subscriber not to buy that particular book.
Your definition of 'peddling' is at odds with the dictionary.
Longdog was the one that put the book up not ceylon2

Then using troll (a favourite word used by fmotl) to strengthen the peddling word so that friends, followers and subscribers share elsewhere. At the same time while pushing hatred towards another. That pusher is sat behind a monitor rubbing his/her hands and sniggering while still typing how much they don't care.
Your asserting that Quatloos is den of FMOTL shills is as laughable as it is pathetic.
I'm asserting nothing of the sort, I was in conversation with Dessent as you can see

They also find out that the book author has a website similar to a website that he/she loves to use and will try and damage that too by calling it a sham (this type of person is also known as hypocrite).


You've got that arse about face... You came here plugging your website and people noticed one of the few threads on your forum (Which has but one active member... You) is advertising your book. It took no sleuthing skills on our part.
I am entitled to plug my website, it is the rule of this forum called SIGNATURE now I think you should be using the opposite to arse about face into dick for yourself :)
While attempting to create negative thoughts to others they will also attempt to put a halt to the author speaking out or defending themselves by throwing them out of the room, closing the door or banning them (another favourite of the fmotl), this is done so that the hypocrite or hater can keep using psychology without interference.


Twelve hours ago you LANCB'ed "you bunch of lovely people bye fuckin bye"... https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalW ... oming_back
That was a reaction to a comment which I appologised within 20 seconds but you forget that don't you?
They will then ask to move on to more interesting subjects but without a thought they simply want to carry on as top dog in the subject as what the author is doing. It's really an ego thing or jealousy or protecting the real troll. I do not know who you are on about for pedling this book whether it is ceylon2 or longdog although longdog is a friend of yours I guess it must be ceylon2
Gibberish.
Gibberish? Is that it?

Another tactic is to attack race, colour, punctuation, language...
Nobody has attacked you for your race (which we don't know) or your colour (which we also don't know) so lay off with the martyr complex.
In the context of the attack on my English, I was describing similar attacks used by haters

Moving on to the punctuation and language the criticism started, quite reasonably, with people pointing out that your claim to have studied law for three years was at odds with your standard of written English.
Firstly it is not 3 years it is starting my third year and secondly, to study law has nothing to do with language but would be a help if you practised law, the language barrier is no problem, as long as your assignments are written in simple English and can be taken that the writer understands the assignment subject written about.
...while they themselves cannot speak their own which in the uk would be the queens English
What in the name of Sooty, Sweep and Sue are you talking about?
I am sentencing you to 2 years imprisoment, Send the defendant down
I am sending youz to jail for fwwwkin 2 years, do ya bird

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:25 am
by Wakeman52
notorial dissent wrote:I think it is time to lock this topic and move on to something more interesting.
Agreed, after having read this thread and looked at the 'book' on Amazon!

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:28 am
by longdog
I'd put more tobacco in it if I were you because I don't have the least idea what you're waffling on about.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:28 am
by ceylon2
JimUk1 wrote:Have you come on here purely to advertise your ebook?

Why not try and sell it at the upcoming meeting of the great minds in Nottingham?

I doubt anyone in here needs reminding what a pair of hypocrites Ceylon and Witterick are.

In fact Jon was given column inches in the Gaurdiun (The Guardian) in which he was throughly slated by rational people.

I would have though that would be enough alone for people to take note, yet alone even write a book and try and sell it for £15.00!

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... es-economy
The book was not written for sane paeople like yourself it was written for the vulnerable people that have found themselves in financial difficulty. The title of the book says it all.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:29 am
by arayder
On Sunday in the OP, ceylon2, you asked:
ceylon2 wrote:I once used the af4v method with my water company for a friend lol it did not work. . . i would like to help others understand that these people are very dangerous and their information will lead to misery. If there is anyone here that could help with my forum i would appreciate it. http://goodf2.forumotion.com
So let's cut to the chase, ceylon2, and ask exactly what help you want?

If we can't get to the point, I vote with the others to lock the thread.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:30 am
by ceylon2
longdog wrote:I'd put more tobacco in it if I were you because I don't have the least idea what you're waffling on about.
You wouldn't longdog due to the fact that they have an answer to whatever you are trying to say

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:30 am
by ceylon2
arayder wrote:On Sunday in the OP, ceylon2, you asked:
ceylon2 wrote:I once used the af4v method with my water company for a friend lol it did not work. . . i would like to help others understand that these people are very dangerous and their information will lead to misery. If there is anyone here that could help with my forum i would appreciate it. http://goodf2.forumotion.com
So let's cut to the chase, ceylon2, and ask exactly what help you want?
What help I want ???????????????????

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:33 am
by arayder
Okay, that's it!

Lock the thread, please.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:37 am
by longdog
ceylon2 wrote:
longdog wrote:I'd put more tobacco in it if I were you because I don't have the least idea what you're waffling on about.
You wouldn't longdog due to the fact that they have an answer to whatever you are trying to say
More gibberish I'm afraid.

Re: Disinformation spreaders

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:38 am
by longdog
arayder wrote:Okay, that's it!

Lock the thread, please.
Nah... Let it run... Pour encourager les autres