SteveUK wrote:Charles ‘Catalogue Wife’ Spencer’s attempt to get benefits for his Ukrainian kid has hit the buffers.
Well it's not actually his kid. It's his Ukrainian "girlfriend's" kid and he had nothing to do with its arrival into this world. Not only is the kid not his the kid and her mother have been refused entry visas because the immigration bods think she won't return home.
Funnily enough his Facebook page is awash with posts about immigrants "comin' over 'ere claimin' our benefits" but you know.... Something, something, something, Muslamics, something , something.
He also claims that he is the sole financial support for his 'family' but he's living on benefits himself so how likely is that on a scale of nought to fuck-all?
The tribunal pointed out that for the kid to get the £ , Ukraine would need to be in the EEA and have reciprocal arrangements.
He then bangs on about us not being in the EEA which err, actually weakens his argument when you think of it. The tribunal also ‘praised’ his ‘lengthy sunmission’ Which also managed to do some Muslim bashing.
Try as I might I can't see the 'logic' in his argument. Perhaps the nearest I can get is "I'm white and therefore you should pay me all the benefits I ask for and take them off the brown people".
The Derby 5th case is him trying to overturn this. Good link with that!
No it's not. He was simply rehashing one of his previous legal failures as an example of how corrupt the system is. His opportunity to overturn the decision of the first tier benefits tribunal lay with an appeal to the upper tribunal and then the courts. He didn't appeal and he's way out of time for doing so now.