Freeman of the Year 2019

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 8221
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Freeman of the Year 2019

Post by Burnaby49 »

Gone but not forgotten. Pigpot joined Quatloos on July 07, 2015 and, after 546 wild raving obscene rants, was banned in March 2017. He wasn't really a sovereign, just a lunatic.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
JimUk1
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm

Re: Freeman of the Year 2019

Post by JimUk1 »

Burnaby49 wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:35 pmHe wasn't really a sovereign, just a lunatic.
Question is, is there much of a difference?
Dr. Caligari
J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Freeman of the Year 2019

Post by Dr. Caligari »

JimUk1 wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:09 pm
Burnaby49 wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:35 pmHe wasn't really a sovereign, just a lunatic.
Question is, is there much of a difference?
All sovereigns are lunatics, but not all lunatics are sovereigns.
Dr. Caligari
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Freeman of the Year 2019

Post by notorial dissent »

Dr. Caligari wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:57 pm
JimUk1 wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 8:09 pm
Burnaby49 wrote: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:35 pmHe wasn't really a sovereign, just a lunatic.
Question is, is there much of a difference?
All sovereigns are lunatics, but not all lunatics are sovereigns.
A very good summation I would say.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.