Page 12 of 14
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:29 am
by DailyPlanet
There's an uncanny resemblance
There are round objects on both sides of the each photo. (! ?)
Maybe the makers-of-the-crop circles were intending to file a patent,
and HG's machine will not be allowed to work, until she acknowledges that.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:04 am
by DailyPlanet
Hopegirl explains...
The Quantum Energy Generator 2015 HopeGirl Speaks: Why We Did What We Did.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUMALlERkMo
She tries to grab some of Mrs. Gamble's "prestige",
and then pieces together images of starving people, etc.
No doubt, she understands the plight of those who go without meals.
Then she lists her heroes...
Clearly, she will be joining that list.
But how did she stay out of Jail ??
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 4:46 am
by LightinDarkness
Easy on how she stayed out of jail - she moved to Mocorro. Which has no extradition treaty with the US...just like Heather Tucci Jarraf.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Thu May 07, 2015 12:31 am
by JamesVincent
A friend of mine posted this today.
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2014/04/14/o ... -released/
In a world of problems and solutions, few ideas spur both immediate hope and skepticism as the idea of free energy, and, on the brink of ecological disaster, nothing may be of greater importance to the human race.
The story of Nikola Tesla is a remarkable reminder of how our economic, political and media systems create our reality, because it shows how human ingenuity can be co-opted, shut-down, taken-over and hushed by powerful people with financial interests at stake. Fortunately, the legacy of Tesla lives on and people are now more interested than ever in his theories about cosmic energy and his patents for energy systems that could offer promise for liberating earth from dependence on fossil fuels.
I know it's from last year but I hadn't seen it mentioned anywhere and it's obviously floating around.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Thu May 07, 2015 7:11 am
by JamesVincent
The same guy just informed me that they are building a billion dollar power plant in Nevada.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Thu May 07, 2015 7:32 am
by notorial dissent
I don't know if Waking Times stole that from Fix the World or vice versa, but that is the same nonsense they were peddling.
So if they're going to build a plant in NV, where are they getting the money, and have they actually built one that works? Betting not.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Thu May 07, 2015 8:08 am
by LightinDarkness
notorial dissent wrote:I don't know if Waking Times stole that from Fix the World or vice versa, but that is the same nonsense they were peddling.
So if they're going to build a plant in NV, where are they getting the money, and have they actually built one that works? Betting not.
It is almost like "the circle of life" except it is "the circle of scams." What was old becomes new again, burns brightly with new age true believers, and then fades. Then the cycle starts all over. It is conning the same group of idiots with the same types of scams, but none of the marks seem to care.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Sat May 09, 2015 1:40 am
by morrand
JamesVincent wrote:The same guy just informed me that they are building a billion dollar power plant in Nevada.
Given the wholesale price of electricity right now, not a chance. Any power plant that's going to be worth $1B is either going to have to be absolutely massive, or is going to have an insanely long payback period. Even if it is pulling power from the quantum universe, or whatever.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 10:25 am
by Jeffrey
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 8:55 pm
by Deep Knight
Low, yes, but a great low video! I laughed, I cried, I hurled! Instead of saying, "Oops, we're leaking a lot of electromagnitism here*," they're whopping it up like this means something positive.
*actually not - it's complicated.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 9:39 pm
by JamesVincent
Alright, here goes. Forgive my lack of correct terminology, it has been a long time since I studied this stuff.
Wonder of wonders, it's not actually doing anything. Current is passing through the tube, via the ground wire it has attached, while they are touching it to a surface (magnet? metal block?). So the only thing this shows is that there is current in the mechanism. True RF radiation would light the tube without anything touching it and you would not want to touch it to metal while it's lit, makes a pretty nice boom since it then grounds out the RF. Seen it happen several times lighting fluorescent tubes off of a CB antennae.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 10:03 pm
by Gregg
Look at how many darn wires there are coming out of that thing! Its a Medusa QEG! It looks to me like the Morroco Village Idiot Water Pump transferred to where ever they're all couch surfing at this month. If it wasn't for the fact that the "all in" cost of this little light bulb trick was somewhere in the range of a quarter million dollars, it would be pathetic.
As it is, the real pathetic part is people still believe this family of cheap grifters.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 1:29 pm
by Deep Knight
The person who is really Deep Knight is a chemist, but his father was an Electrical Engineering Professor and didn't let him out of the house without knowing some basics. So, let me take a stab at this.
What they got here is an electromagnetic whiz bang with magnets and coils moving in relation to each other. This produces electric currents and fields. These fields form and collapse as the magnetism and currents move and/or modulate. A static charge forms on an outside dielectric (insulator, e.g. electrical tape or plastic wrap) which is enough to fire an small fluorescent bulb (cause an arc to form). Once this arc forms, it's a new path to ground for the currents induced in the terminals and filament at that end of the bulb by those same fields, and it stays lit. Well, sometimes, if you get it in the right place where the fields are strong enough. And, boys and girls, if they had good instruments, they would see that the actual output of their spiky current generator falls a tiny bit when they do this, 'cause there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. Except for us Illuminati - restaurant owners are so terrified when we flash our secret hand signals that they never bill us! Sweet.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 8:32 pm
by Gregg
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 9:12 pm
by JamesVincent
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 11:09 pm
by Deep Knight
"That's what's goin' through our brains when we talk on the CBs!"
My gut tells me that they're going too slow for RF, unless their "resonant tuning" ended up being at a much, much higher frequency than I thought (from the inherent speed of their whirlygig, and the protests over the size of the capacitors and their expense - higher frequencies=smaller caps). But who knows, these idiots are inept enough to have done almost anything with their science project, for all we know they're running an auto ignition coil from the thing to get higher voltages and making a poor man's Tesla coil instead...
Any garden-variety static electricity source can run a small fluorescent, I've seen it done with this generator (can't remember the name) made from a rotating disc of plastic with large areas of copper foil on it and static brushes. The trick is getting it to fire for the first time (you crank faster until it lights). Charge up a big metal ball (and we Illuminati have some ... oh, never mind) and if you hold your tube nearby it will light up. Also good for interrogating Sovereign Citizens and anti-NWO-types of all ilks, threaten to hold their tubes near it and they light up with answers to all your questions.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 3:16 am
by notorial dissent
Gregg wrote:For slightly less budget, and even safe and legal to build on US Soil, I recommend they do this next time, not only will it work as advertised, they might learn something from this 4th grade science project.
I'll bet they'd screw up the circuit. Too complicated...
DK, my limited recollections of having played with this stuff back in the dark ages tells me you are probably right. If they'd done the wiring right and were going fast enough, i.e. getting the right frequency output, I don't see how they could avoid lighting up the tube, or themselves for that matter. I have a feeling that if there was a way to screw this up they undoubtedly and unquestionably did. It has been too long since I actually worked with this stuff, but the description just sounds WRONG, for it to be working as claimed.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 8:12 pm
by Dick Dastardly
I'm no Electrical Engineer, but I do know that whatever inefficiencies there may be on the electrical side of it, mechanically using a V-belt to transmit power will introduce significant losses as well. That so called engineer featured in the video reminds me of some caped magician sawing a body in half at an old time carnival.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 2:58 pm
by morrand
Dick Dastardly wrote:That so called engineer featured in the video reminds me of some caped magician sawing a body in half at an old time carnival.
Deep Knight wrote:My gut tells me that they're going too slow for RF, unless their "resonant tuning" ended up being at a much, much higher frequency than I thought (from the inherent speed of their whirlygig, and the protests over the size of the capacitors and their expense - higher frequencies=smaller caps). But who knows, these idiots are inept enough to have done almost anything with their science project, for all we know they're running an auto ignition coil from the thing to get higher voltages and making a poor man's Tesla coil instead...
I'd thought that was the case, too, but it occurs to me that it's such an awful, awful core design that there's probably a ton of magnetic flux leakage going on, and they may be making the homebrew equivalent of an
induction fixture instead. Cute, and impressive, and also much less likely to kill anyone standing around. (By the way, I suspect that any CBer who's able to light a fluorescent tube—and get rapped—off their rig just might be running...a bit hot, shall we say.)
Any garden-variety static electricity source can run a small fluorescent, I've seen it done with this generator (can't remember the name) made from a rotating disc of plastic with large areas of copper foil on it and static brushes.
Wimshurst machine? It's actually too bad they didn't build that instead. A good 10-foot Wimshurst would be a whole lot more impressive on a mad science level than the giant noise machine they wound up with.
Re: QEG : Has it reached "Over-unity"?
Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 4:24 pm
by JamesVincent
