Well Armed Bunker Complex 2.0

Practical and Practice issues for Professionals who practice in the area of taxation. Moral, social and economic issues relating to taxes, including international issues, the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, state tax issues, etc. Not for "tax protestor" issues, which should be posted in the "tax protestor" forum above. The advice or opinion given herein should not be relied on for any purpose whatsoever. Also examines cookie-cutter deals that have no economic substance but exist only to generate losses, as marketed by everybody from solo practitioner tax lawyers to the major accounting firms.
User avatar
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 4548
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Well Armed Bunker Complex 2.0

Post by Gregg » Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:50 pm

I'm wanting to build a new house, and at the same time don't want to be on the Title myself, so I'm going to have to set up some structure to give me the privacy I want.
I don't want to avoid taxes or creditors, I just want to foil someone googling my name and an hour later he has the map view on his tablet driving around the Well Armed Bunker Complex...

WHat are the ups and downs of doing it? On my passing, I would want to provide it as a residence fopr any spouse or partner for as long as they live, but then, in the end, sell it off, contents and all, and feed the hungry with the proceeds...or something like.

Doable? Crazy? I'm just looking for a discussion to give me the info I need to go see a local lawyer and tell him what I want, so just ideas pro and con.....thanks
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.

User avatar
Grand Master Consul of Quatloosia
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 4:19 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Well Armed Bunker Complex 2.0

Post by jcolvin2 » Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:36 pm

You may wish to consider a revocable trust with an imaginative name (that could not be linked by the general public with your real name). You would lose none of the benefits of direct ownership (e.g. deduction of mortgage interest and RE taxes), and you could always alter the trust to alter the disposition of the assets if and when your circumstances change.

It would also likely allow this piece of your estate avoid the probate process, which may be a benefit in your state.

Arthur Rubin
Posts: 1481
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Brea, CA

Re: Well Armed Bunker Complex 2.0

Post by Arthur Rubin » Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:51 pm

(I agree with jcolvin2.) Under the circumstances, I wouldn't call it the "Well Armed Bunker Complex 2.0 trust", though. Perhaps the "5 Quatloos trust"? Most of the rest of the message was written before I saw the previous post.

The trustee of a trust is public information, but not likely to be on the Internet. If someone knows the address of the property, they can find the owner from property tax records; in many states, on the Internet. But the owner would be the trust, and your name wouldn't come up directly. If it had an institutional trustee, then your identity would probably only be in their records, and they are not likely to give up your identity without a fight (or being tricked). The terms of a trust are not public.

May be worth a try. You may lose any "homestead" exemption from creditors, but at least in California, you would be considered the owner for homeowners' property tax exemption and for "Proposition 13" basis reduction, as well as for tax purposes mentioned in the previous post. (The basis would increase on your death, and your "partner" would not be considered the owner after death, as he/she couldn't sell the property.)

I am not a lawyer, and this is just something that might work.
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95

Judge Roy Bean
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Posts: 3566
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: West of the Pecos

Re: Well Armed Bunker Complex 2.0

Post by Judge Roy Bean » Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:18 pm

Gregg wrote: ... I'm just looking for a discussion to give me the info I need to go see a local lawyer and tell him what I want, so just ideas pro and con.....thanks
Any offspring involved? Present or future?
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three