Another "Mortgage Not Valid" Claim Fails

Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean, ArthurWankspittle

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Another "Mortgage Not Valid" Claim Fails

Post by Hercule Parrot » Fri Apr 03, 2015 7:34 pm

This recent adjudication by the UK Financial Ombudsman gives little sympathy to another hopeless claim based on the false prophets of GOOFy et al.

I’m very familiar with the statements put forward by Mr and Mrs T – documents downloaded from the internet....

By signing a mortgage deed and by its registration at the Land Registry Mr and Mrs T created a valid mortgage in favour of Barclays. So as far as the law is concerned, I am not persuaded there is any merit to Mr and Mrs T’s argument that they do not have a valid mortgage. ... leID=73078

EDIT - Another one :
In support of their belief they have provided detailed representations in which they cite various ancient authorities, including the Magna Carta, and the Bill of Rights (17th century), using template letters downloaded from the internet ... leID=73405
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.

Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
Posts: 1363
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: Another "Mortgage Not Valid" Claim Fails

Post by littleFred » Fri Apr 03, 2015 9:46 pm

I like this from the first decision:
Ombudsman wrote:These arguments seem to me to have no basis in law, logic or common sense.