|
 |
SPAM-FREE SITE
We do NOT spam. Various multi-level marketers and
other criminals have recently sent out spam impersonating
us, and having our return e-mail address, so that
people would complain about spam and cause us to
be shut down (a/k/a "joe job"). These
multi-level marketers and other criminals have engaged
in this form of cyber-terrorism because our telling
the truth about their fraudulent schemes was hurting
their ability to sell to new victims. Fortunately,
our ISP now recognizes that these fake spams are
bogus and ignores them, and additionally we are
duplicating this site on numerous other servers
(including "hardened" servers as well
as our own proprietary servers) so that we cannot
be harmed by these multi-level marketers and other
criminals. Death to Spammers! |
|
| CAUTION:
This web page was drafted by Quatloos!, and it has
not given permission to anybody to reprint it. Various
scam artists have attempted to copy or "knock
off" this web page to their own web sites (sometimes
making minor changes in an attempt to avoid infringement
of copyright laws) to promote their scam services.
If you see what you believe is a duplicate of this
page, be careful because you are dealing with some
very sleazy people for whom deceit is their modus
operandi and who will not only give you shoddy services,
but probably embezzle your money from you as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
HYIP-Prime
Bank Scam Gallery
("Didn't
you read the stuff about Breton Woods? Your money cannot be touched,
you will make 80%
per
week on it, and it benefits international humanitarian projects
abroad . . .")
|
UNITED STATES SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 14833 / March 5, 1996
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. HAROLD GLANTZ and PETER
H. BLOCK 94 Civ. 5737, (CSH)
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission")
announced that, on February 23, 1996, Judge Charles
S. Haight of the United States District Court,
Southern District of New York, entered an Order
of Preliminary Injunction by Consent against Harold
Glantz ("Glantz").
The Preliminary Injunction stems from a
Complaint filed by the Commission against Glantz
and Peter H. Block on August 8, 1994, seeking,
among other things, injunctive relief, disgorgement
and civil penalties in connection with a "Prime
Bank" investment scheme.
According to the Complaint, Glantz and
Block raised at least $2 million from investors
by telling them that their funds would be used
to obtain a credit line to purchase, sell and\or
trade "prime bank" instruments such
as prime bank notes ("PBNs"), zero interest
credit instruments ("ZICIs"), and zero
interest letters of credit ("ZLOCs").
The Commission's Complaint alleges that
PBNs, ZICIs, and ZLOCs are fictitious.
Judge Haight's Order preliminarily enjoined
Glantz from further violations of the antifraud
provisions of the federal securities laws and
left the issues of disgorgement and civil penalties
for determination at a later date.
Glantz is currently awaiting trial on criminal
charges in the U.S. District Court for the District
of Massachusetts. For further information, see Lit. Rel. No. 14186
|
|
|
Return
to HYIP-Prime Bank Scam Gallery
|
