Quatloos! > Investment
Fraud > HYIP & Bank
Debentures > Exhibit:
Quatloosian HYIP Programs > $88
Million Scam
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17459/April 5, 2002
SEC OBTAINS EMERGENCY COURT ORDERS HALTING $88 MILLION NATIONWIDE
PRIME BANK SCAM AND PRESERVING ASSETS
On April 3, 2002, Judge Earl H. Carroll of the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona granted the Commission's request for various emergency
orders to halt a nationwide, $88 million investment scam, and to recover and
conserve assets for the benefit of victims of the scam.
The Commission alleges in its complaint that the defendants, operating from
Phoenix, Chicago and Houston, sold several bogus investments, including "prime" bank
investments, treasury futures pools and certificates of deposit ("CDs")
from a purported Native American chartered "bank."
The Court entered ex parte orders freezing assets, and requiring an accounting,
the preservation of documents, and the repatriation of funds and assets that
had been moved offshore. The Court also appointed a receiver to recover and
conserve assets for the benefit of investors.
It its complaint, the Commission alleges that the U.S. Reservation Bank & Trust
("USRBT"), a non-incorporated entity granted business charters by
the Rosebud Sioux based in Scottsdale, Arizona, and Global-Link Capital Markets,
Ltd. ("Global-Link"), a limited liability company headquartered in
Houston, Texas, raised $78 million through sales of an investment combining
a "Leveraged Profit Sharing Agreement" ("LPSA") with an
uninsured CD issued by USRBT.
According to the Commission, USRBT and Global-Link officials promised investors
that their funds, while held in "safekeeping," would be "leveraged" to
fund participation in "trading programs" involving United States
Treasury notes and "bank debentures." The Commission further alleges
that USRBT and Global-Link officials promised the investors that they would
receive the greater of 20% of the profits from the trading programs or the
interest on the USRBT-issued CD.
The Commission claims in its complaint that, in reality, USRBT never leveraged
any investor funds for investment in trading programs; rather, USRBT used most
of the investor funds to make "Ponzi" payments of interest and principal
to the investors. In addition, according to the Commission, USRBT officials
misused investor funds by spending over $4 million on salaries, commissions
and personal and business expenses, including a horse racing stable and a purported
casino development company.
The Commission also alleges in its complaint that in a USRBT spin-off scheme,
Higher Investments Technologies, Inc. ("HIT"), a Nevada corporation
headquartered in Mundelein, Illinois, fraudulently raised over $10.6 million
from at least six investors or investment groups. According to the Commission,
HIT offered investors an opportunity to participate in its "Capital Management
Agreements" ("CMAs"), in which HIT, according to its representations
to investors, would use their funds to trade in Treasury bond futures and then
share the profits with the investors.
In reality, HIT used only about 10% of the investors' funds for such trading,
and HIT misused most of the remaining investors' funds by spending them on
its office expenses, including rent, supplies, computers, office repairs, payroll,
and travel, according to the complaint.
The Commission staff coordinated its investigation and lawsuit with several
other federal and state law enforcement agencies. The U.S. Attorney's Offices
in Phoenix and Cincinnati filed civil forfeiture actions against USRBT and
HIT, and seized $20 million and $10.2 million, respectively, against the two
entities. The Commission, in its action, is seeking, among other things, recovery
of additional funds from these and other entities and individuals involved
in the scheme.
In its action, the Commission named as defendants, in addition to USRBT, Global-Link
and HIT, the following individuals, and characterized them in its complaint
as follows:
Edward J. Driving Hawk, Sr., a resident of Mesa, Arizona, is the president
of USRBT, which he has controlled since at least May 1992. He is the father
of Leo and James Driving Hawk.
Leo R. Driving Hawk, Sr., a resident of Higley, Arizona, is currently listed
as vice president of USRBT, with which he has been associated since at least
November 2001.
John M. Adams, a resident of Mundelein, Illinois, was the vice president of
USRBT from at least 1996 to December 2001. While still associated with USRBT,
Adams began raising money for HIT.
Edmund J. Smedley, a resident of Harrison, Ohio, has been associated with
USRBT since at least January 1996. Smedley is currently a vice president of
USRBT.
Kenneth S. Harrison, a resident of Houston, Texas, is the registered agent
for Global-Link. Through his association with Global-Link, Harrison solicited
investors for USRBT.
William J. Herisko, a resident of Palm Springs, California, solicited USRBT
investors through his association with Global-Link.
Thomas T. Emerton, III, a resident of Palm Springs, California, is a principal
of Global-Link. Emerton frequently communicated with USRBT investors under
the auspices of Global-Link.
The Commission also named in its complaint as relief defendants, alleging
they were unjustly enriched through receipt of investor funds, the following
entities and individuals: Oyate Development, Inc., Oyate Enterprises, L.L.P.,
Oyate Trust, River Walk Development, L.L.C., Ringthunder Racing Stables, Inc.,
HPHC, Inc., James R. Driving Hawk and Orpha Jane Johnston (collectively, "relief
defendants"). In granting the Commission's ex parte motion, the Court
also froze investor funds in the possession or control of the relief defendants.
In its complaint, the Commission alleges that defendants USRBT and HIT violated
Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"), and
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act")
and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Commission also alleges that defendants Global-Link,
Edward Driving Hawk, Leo Driving Hawk, Adams, Smedley, Harrison, Herisko and
Emerton violated Sections 17(a) of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and
15(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In addition to the emergency
relief granted by the Court, the Commission seeks, as against the defendants,
preliminary and permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest,
and civil money penalties. The Commission is also seeking disgorgement from
the relief defendants.
Unscrupulous promoters continue to victimize the public with Prime Bank schemes.
Accordingly, investors are advised to access the Commission's "Prime Bank" Investor
Alert, which provides tips on how to avoid being a victim of these scams. The
investor alert can be found on the Commission's web site, at www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/primebank.shtml.
The Commission acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of several other
government agencies in this matter, including the, the U.S. Customs Service
in Phoenix, the U.S. Attorney's Offices in Phoenix and Cincinnati, and the
Texas State Securities Board.