Quatloos! > Investment
Fraud > HYIP & Bank
Debentures > Exhibit:
Quatloosian HYIP Programs > SEC
v CDH
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 17386 / February 27, 2002
SEC v. CDH & Affiliates, Inc. and C. David
Hallman, Civil Action Number 3:02-CV-017-JTC (N.D. Ga.)
SEC CHARGES CDH & AFFILIATES, INC. AND
C. DAVID HALLMAN OF FAYETTEVILLE, GEORGIA WITH FRAUD
|
 |
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it filed
a civil injunctive action on February 25, 2002, in United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia, against C. David Hallman and CDH & Affiliates,
Inc., both of Fayetteville, Georgia.
The Commission's complaint alleges that from September 1997 through at least
June 1999, Hallman and CDH, a corporation that Hallman controlled, fraudulently
raised more than $2.2 million in fees from at least 27 customers, purportedly
to prepare corporate bond offerings and sell the bonds for its customers. According
to the complaint, Hallman and CDH misappropriated the funds for their own purposes.
The complaint also alleges that in an effort to avoid detection of their scheme,
Hallman and CDH continued, until at least July 2001 to tell their customers
that the customers' bond issues would be funded, and made other misrepresentations
to encourage the customers to believe that funding was imminent.
According to the complaint, Hallman made numerous misrepresentations to CDH's
customers, including false claims that some companies' bonds had been successfully
sold, that bond sales were imminent and that the proceeds of the bond sales
would be invested in a high-yield investment program that would pay 30%-40%
every ten days. The complaint alleges that CDH never sold bonds for any customer
and that no such high-yield investment program exists. The complaint also alleges
that Hallman and CDH operated as unregistered brokers while selling this investment
scheme to CDH's customers.
The SEC's complaint charges Hallman and CDH with violations of Sections 10(b)
and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.
The SEC seeks permanent injunctions, accountings, disgorgement of ill-gotten
gains, and civil penalties against both Hallman and CDH.