|
 |
SPAM-FREE SITE
We do NOT spam. Various multi-level marketers and
other criminals have recently sent out spam impersonating
us, and having our return e-mail address, so that
people would complain about spam and cause us to
be shut down (a/k/a "joe job"). These
multi-level marketers and other criminals have engaged
in this form of cyber-terrorism because our telling
the truth about their fraudulent schemes was hurting
their ability to sell to new victims. Fortunately,
our ISP now recognizes that these fake spams are
bogus and ignores them, and additionally we are
duplicating this site on numerous other servers
(including "hardened" servers as well
as our own proprietary servers) so that we cannot
be harmed by these multi-level marketers and other
criminals. Death to Spammers! |
|
| CAUTION:
This web page was drafted by Quatloos!, and it has
not given permission to anybody to reprint it. Various
scam artists have attempted to copy or "knock
off" this web page to their own web sites (sometimes
making minor changes in an attempt to avoid infringement
of copyright laws) to promote their scam services.
If you see what you believe is a duplicate of this
page, be careful because you are dealing with some
very sleazy people for whom deceit is their modus
operandi and who will not only give you shoddy services,
but probably embezzle your money from you as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
HYIP-Prime
Bank Scam Gallery
("Didn't
you read the stuff about Breton Woods? Your money cannot be touched,
you will make 80%
per
week on it, and it benefits international humanitarian projects
abroad . . .")
 UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
Litigation Release No. 17135 / September 18,
2001
Securities
and Exchange Commission v. Daniel E. Schneider,
et al., Defendants and Gordon A. Dunlop, et al.,
Relief Defendants, Civil Action No. 98-CV-14-D
(D. WY)
The
Commission announced that on August 8, 2001, the
United States District Court for the District
of Wyoming granted its Motion for Summary Judgment
against relief defendants Gordon Dunlop and his
entity, First Consortium International. Dunlop
and First Consortium received ill-gotten gains
obtained by Daniel Schneider in an illegal prime
bank trading scheme. The Court, in its previous
order of
August
31, 1999 found that Schneider had violated Section
17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10-b 5 thereunder.
After
reviewing the evidence, the court concluded that
relief defendants Dunlop and First Consortium
received ill-gotten gains from Schneider to which
they had no legitimate claim. The court ordered
that Dunlop and First Consortium pay disgorgement
in the amount of $456,000 plus prejudgment interest.
from:
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr17135.htm
|
|
|
Return
to HYIP-Prime Bank Scam Gallery
|
