Wouldn't that make him an animal and still subject to protection under animal cruelty laws?Zeke_the_Meek wrote:Essentially, feel free to punch Peter in the face. He's not a person and therefore unprotected by the law.
Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Tupa-O-Quatloosia
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
- Location: Brea, CA
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:58 pm
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Article 6.Peter Of England - I'm a non resident, non-person alien, non citizen, non subject. I have also invoked my authority as a Sovereign being under Article 6 of the UDHR to be recognised as a "non person!"
Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
http://www.un.org/en/universal-declarat ... an-rights/
Doesn't mention any right to non-recognition, or recognition as a non-person. Nor does it require any sovereign authority (which is fortunate, as Cheatin' Pete hasn't got any of that).
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
It's the basic freedman "I can opt out of laws" magic hat crap. But that's a not hard sell to anyone who would swallow Yalta Bite Size.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Another were win !!!1!! From his Facebook page
Peter, I called and asked for your help yesterday whilst appearing in Manchester Mags court, I payed my Council Tax with a were chq, they eventually after having it for six months returned it to me, and yesterday I was so terrified in court, I confirmed my details and they did exactly what you said they would do (stand up/sit down) and the magistrate said you sent a chq, which could never be cashed or transferred to the council, I explained to him about special presentation and how Barclays refused to do it as it wasn't recognised by uk banking clearing, they adjusted and returned and said I now have a 3 month prison sentence suspended until I pay the whole £5800 back to the council at £350 per month!!! I asked for the amount to be reduced and he said no! He also referred it to me stealing from those who do pay for CT, I have £60-80 per month to spare, I cannot afford £350 pm like they set it .
What can I do?
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 1:37 am
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
OUCH. Looks like the first prison sentence handed to a WeRe sucker, unless he/she takes out a fairly hefty loan (which is probably impossible given their current situation.)SteveUK wrote:Another were win !!!1!! From his Facebook page
Peter, I called and asked for your help yesterday whilst appearing in Manchester Mags court, I payed my Council Tax with a were chq, they eventually after having it for six months returned it to me, and yesterday I was so terrified in court, I confirmed my details and they did exactly what you said they would do (stand up/sit down) and the magistrate said you sent a chq, which could never be cashed or transferred to the council, I explained to him about special presentation and how Barclays refused to do it as it wasn't recognised by uk banking clearing, they adjusted and returned and said I now have a 3 month prison sentence suspended until I pay the whole £5800 back to the council at £350 per month!!! I asked for the amount to be reduced and he said no! He also referred it to me stealing from those who do pay for CT, I have £60-80 per month to spare, I cannot afford £350 pm like they set it .
What can I do?
Only has £60-£80 per month, wastes half of it on a dud chequebook. Well done, dipshit.
Go directly to jail. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 Re.What can I do?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 1:37 am
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
So even just asking a simple question gets you investigated by PoE. Christ, how paranoid IS this guy?Paul Doyle: Peter, do you trust Julian Assange?
Peter Of England: Absolutely!
Peter Of England: No videos - No friends. No reviews. No timeline. Hmmm!
And Peter, ya dingbat, the reason he's using a sock account is probably because you've banned his main one for some other trivial reason.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Hmm - Peter was quick to remove my quoted friend and his council tax woes.
So, for prosperity's sake
So, for prosperity's sake
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:12 am
- Location: England, UK
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Instead of helping, Peter suppresses the question. Gosh, what a surprise.
I suppose £5800 is 4 or 5 years of "wilful refusal or culpable neglect". The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 s47:
Pay up. Or, if you prefer, go to jail and then pay up.Garyk Martin wrote:What can I do?
I suppose £5800 is 4 or 5 years of "wilful refusal or culpable neglect". The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 s47:
If (and only if) the court is of the opinion that his failure is due to his wilful refusal or culpable neglect it may if it thinks fit [...] fix a term of imprisonment and postpone the issue of the warrant until such time and on such conditions (if any) as the court thinks just.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
What a God awful mess !!SteveUK wrote:Hmm - Peter was quick to remove my quoted friend and his council tax woes.
So, for prosperity's sake
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
I wonder if the WeRe check, and his attempts to justify writing it, were a factor in qualifying this poor sap for "willful refusal or culpable neglect" and thus jail time. If so, that should send a very scary message to anyone who wrote a WeRe Bank check. It won't, but it should.littleFred wrote:I suppose £5800 is 4 or 5 years of "wilful refusal or culpable neglect". The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 s47:If (and only if) the court is of the opinion that his failure is due to his wilful refusal or culpable neglect it may if it thinks fit [...] fix a term of imprisonment and postpone the issue of the warrant until such time and on such conditions (if any) as the court thinks just.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
I am very surprised Pete has made it this far without repercussions.
I have been reading this forum for a while, and am very surprised the Germans have taken to him, I've always found them very logical thinkers; I worked in Frankfurt for a longtime.
Since the brexit vote it has pretty much cemented, in my mind anyway, that people simple do not trust the government or any institution experts and thus turn to the internets most ludicrous gurus.
I have been reading this forum for a while, and am very surprised the Germans have taken to him, I've always found them very logical thinkers; I worked in Frankfurt for a longtime.
Since the brexit vote it has pretty much cemented, in my mind anyway, that people simple do not trust the government or any institution experts and thus turn to the internets most ludicrous gurus.
-
- Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:12 am
- Location: England, UK
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Welcome, JimUk1. Great phrase, "luscious gurus".
To the extent that it deceives suckers, yes, I think it is. If a sucker thinks WeRe is a way to get out of paying £1000 per year, and spends the cash saved so they can't then afford to buy themselves out of jail, I think it's a major factor.TheNewSaint wrote:I wonder if the WeRe check, and his attempts to justify writing it, were a factor in qualifying this poor sap for "willful refusal or culpable neglect" and thus jail time.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
I love that he's shocked to have heard the judge say this. Yes Garyk, the reasoning behind jail time for non-payment of tax is that by continuing to receive benefits paid for by taxes while refusing to pay taxes yourself, you're effectively stealing from those who do pay taxes. Everyone else now has to pay slightly more in taxes because you tried to cheat the system.Garyk wrote:He also referred to it as stealing from those who do pay council tax
No different than splitting the check at dinner. If you put zero dollars into the pot, everyone else has to put more money to cover you.
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Just in case anyone was wondering £5800 is over 2 years CT of the biggest and most expensive houses in Manchester and about 6 years worth of the cheapest. This person has likely been avoiding paying for 3-4 years. No wonder he is in the "wilful refusal or culpable neglect" category.Peter, I called and asked for your help yesterday whilst appearing in Manchester Mags court, I payed my Council Tax with a were chq, they eventually after having it for six months returned it to me, and yesterday I was so terrified in court, I confirmed my details and they did exactly what you said they would do (stand up/sit down) and the magistrate said you sent a chq, which could never be cashed or transferred to the council, I explained to him about special presentation and how Barclays refused to do it as it wasn't recognised by uk banking clearing, they adjusted and returned and said I now have a 3 month prison sentence suspended until I pay the whole £5800 back to the council at £350 per month!!! I asked for the amount to be reduced and he said no! He also referred it to me stealing from those who do pay for CT, I have £60-80 per month to spare, I cannot afford £350 pm like they set it .
What can I do?
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Gunners Mate
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2015 5:09 pm
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
I'd have thought that £60-80 a month 'spare' would actually be the council tax! I think mine's £75.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:03 pm
- Location: No longer on a train
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Mines nearer £140, my mothers is £160 or so.
-
- Swabby
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:21 pm
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
It depends where you live, your council tax band and whether you live on your own. Mine is only just over £60 per month.Footloose52 wrote:Mines nearer £140, my mothers is £160 or so.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Is it possible that £5800 includes interest, late fees, fines, etc.?ArthurWankspittle wrote:Just in case anyone was wondering £5800 is over 2 years CT of the biggest and most expensive houses in Manchester and about 6 years worth of the cheapest.
-
- J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:02 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Since this is the UK forum, wouldn't that be "gaol"?Go directly to jail.
Dr. Caligari
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 1:37 am
Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank
Probably. Regardless of how it breaks down, how on earth do you even get to that level of council tax debt? I missed one payment once due to a direct debit mix up, and they made it sound like they were going to nuke the house if I didn't rectify it right there and then.TheNewSaint wrote: Is it possible that £5800 includes interest, late fees, fines, etc.?
Regardless, Peter has some winning advice for our man:
False equivocation, because you're comparing real cash with a useless piece of paper. And regardless of how long they kept the piece of paper, they did NOT accept it, and neither did the judge.If they kept it then they ACCEPTED IT did they not? Where's the wriggle room there? If you give £100 note to your mechanic and he doesn't return it to you what does that say?
Irrelevant anyway; he won't get another chance to argue the veracity of the cheque. It's pay time.