Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
-
- Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"
Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
This goes to show how corrupt the appeals courts can be as they undermine the rule of law.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/10/ ... onvictions
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/10/ ... onvictions
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:33 pm
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
I assume you're refering to the case about the convictions of Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson.Number Six wrote:This goes to show how corrupt the appeals courts can be
Article According to cnbc: http://www.cnbc.com/id/102249787
A claim of corruption is pretty serious and should be met with an equivalent of explanation and actual evidence. I don't have a subscription to the New York Times and as a result do not have knowledge of what evidence may have been presented in that article.
Perhaps you can elaborate on why you believe the appeals court is corrupt in this situation?
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
I think that he forgot to include the "sarcasm on" smiley.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
Based on reading the article, the appeals court did the right thing. The problem seems to the law is super lax.
-
- Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
Just read the comments on this decision by other readers, many people stated that appeals courts make backward decisions like this contrary to the collective will of punishing insider trading.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
-
- A Councilor of the Kabosh
- Posts: 3055
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
- Location: Wherever my truck goes.
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
Number Six wrote:Just read the comments on this decision by other readers, many people stated that appeals courts make backward decisions like this contrary to the collective will of punishing insider trading.
The Appeals court ruled on law, not the collective will. If the law is funky or not broad enough the court cannot change it, only note that, in their opinion, the law needs changed.Jeffrey wrote:Based on reading the article, the appeals court did the right thing. The problem seems to the law is super lax.
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire
Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire
Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
-
- Tupa-O-Quatloosia
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
- Location: Brea, CA
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
I've often thought that the "insider trading" laws were so badly written so that neither intent nor attempt at gain was required. Apparently, the court agreed that that was improper.
Last edited by Arthur Rubin on Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: clean up grammar
Reason: clean up grammar
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
![Image](http://www.eff.org/br/br.gif)
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
-
- Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
The law relies on collective will for the greater good, it is not some theoretical and impractical construct. The only people backing this reversal are those with a bias to do so. Just read the reactions, thinking people will continue to pull out of stocks.JamesVincent wrote:Number Six wrote:Just read the comments on this decision by other readers, many people stated that appeals courts make backward decisions like this contrary to the collective will of punishing insider trading.The Appeals court ruled on law, not the collective will. If the law is funky or not broad enough the court cannot change it, only note that, in their opinion, the law needs changed.Jeffrey wrote:Based on reading the article, the appeals court did the right thing. The problem seems to the law is super lax.
Just wait until they water down Dodd-Frank further: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/ ... dget-bill/
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
-
- Stowaway
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:29 am
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
Disagreeing with a court decision is different from having evidence that the court is corrupt.
If laws are too lax, that's something to take to the legislature. It's not as though Congress has created a set of perfect laws that the courts are then messing up. Sometimes courts even say "if you want X result, you need to change the law in this way," and the legislature does nothing. There are a lot of things I'm not happy about with the current Supreme Court; in some of those cases, Congress could have passed new legislation to fix those problems, and didn't. In others, it's governors and legislators who are using the dubious court rulings. There's nothing in the current rules about eminent domain that requires a municipality to take private property and hand it to a favored developer, for example.
If laws are too lax, that's something to take to the legislature. It's not as though Congress has created a set of perfect laws that the courts are then messing up. Sometimes courts even say "if you want X result, you need to change the law in this way," and the legislature does nothing. There are a lot of things I'm not happy about with the current Supreme Court; in some of those cases, Congress could have passed new legislation to fix those problems, and didn't. In others, it's governors and legislators who are using the dubious court rulings. There's nothing in the current rules about eminent domain that requires a municipality to take private property and hand it to a favored developer, for example.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:33 pm
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
You are incorrect. I currently (based on what little I know of the case and ruling) back the decision and have no bias for said position. Such all-encompassing statements are usually very wrong.Number Six wrote:The only people backing this reversal are those with a bias to do so.
I'm a Canadian whose only investment is in a company in Canada. I have no access to insider information in said company and do not want such access. Given the situation, the ruling, the US Laws surrounding the ruling, the companies and individuals involved - there is absolutely no relationship to me.
If you wish to use the term "bias" in it's broadest sense rather than in the sense of negative bias which is usually how it is applied - then my only bias is that I am an absolute firm believer in equal application of existing Law applied to everyone no matter what their position in Society is. However, in that broadest sense, you too have your own biases relative to the situation. So if a broadly defined bias is wrong, it also applies to yourself.
Is the currently Law badly written? According the media I've read, it does appear so. But the correct location to change the Law (other then Laws that present a Constitutional breach) is in talking to your political representation.... it's not the Courts. There are very sound reasons behind separation of powers. It is not within the Powers of the Courts to make Law.
Should the two be guilty of a financial crime?
Being completely unfamiliar with the case and evidence to support such a finding: My only position on the subject is "Innocent until proven guilty".
-
- Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
I'll leave to the lawyers, pro and con, it just seems to me that the cases were being thrown out on relatively small matters and that they were engaged in insider trading. Possibly the DA is over-zealous, I would just hate to see the other cases unravel.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
-
- Tupa-O-Quatloosia
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
- Location: Brea, CA
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
And people say the NY Times isn't "liberal". If it weren't for the names of the criminals defendants being the same, I would have thought that the NY Times and CNBC were talking about different cases entirely.
Last edited by Arthur Rubin on Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: adjust spacing
Reason: adjust spacing
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
![Image](http://www.eff.org/br/br.gif)
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal
Point #2. I agree it definitely was insider trading.it just seems to me that the cases were being thrown out on relatively small matters and that they were engaged in insider trading
Point #1. The issue is explained in the articles:
This seems to be purely the legislatures fault for making the requirements for a conviction so strict.the act of insider trading is not explicitly prohibited in a federal statute. In its place, a patchwork of legal opinions and regulations define the law...
in order to sustain a conviction for insider trading, the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the tippee knew that an insider disclosed confidential information and that he did so in exchange for a personal benefit
If I'm reading this right, you can have the hypothetical case of me operating a hedge fund. I get a tip from an employee that works at a publicly traded company saying next quarters numbers will be good. I buy a ton of stock, make a killing. But since I did not know that the employee was breaking a confidentiality agreement, I'm off the hook despite clearly making money off insider information. Or even if I know 100% that the information is confidential, as long as I don't know the person feeding me the information isn't doing it for a benefit, IE me paying him for it or him getting a benefit indirectly from my trade, it's not a crime.