Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Stock and Bond Fraud, including Boiler Rooms / Pump and Dump Schemes, Mutual Fund & Hedge Fund Fraud, FOREX scams, plus Churning, Private Placements, Venture and Bridge Funding, IPOs, Viaticals Fraud, HYIP and Prime Bank scams, MTNs, Historical Notes, Recovery Schemes, etc. Includes the Jim Norman Project and the Michael Dotson Project and similar HYIP scams.
User avatar
Number Six
Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
Posts: 1107
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:35 pm
Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"

Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Number Six » Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:37 pm

This goes to show how corrupt the appeals courts can be as they undermine the rule of law.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/10/ ... onvictions
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)

'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)

Hyrion
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 615
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 2:33 pm

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Hyrion » Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:57 pm

Number Six wrote:This goes to show how corrupt the appeals courts can be


I assume you're refering to the case about the convictions of Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson.

Article According to cnbc: http://www.cnbc.com/id/102249787

A claim of corruption is pretty serious and should be met with an equivalent of explanation and actual evidence. I don't have a subscription to the New York Times and as a result do not have knowledge of what evidence may have been presented in that article.

Perhaps you can elaborate on why you believe the appeals court is corrupt in this situation?

User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 4930
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Pottapaug1938 » Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:08 pm

I think that he forgot to include the "sarcasm on" smiley.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools

Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2524
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:16 am

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Jeffrey » Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:50 pm

Based on reading the article, the appeals court did the right thing. The problem seems to the law is super lax.

User avatar
Number Six
Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
Posts: 1107
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:35 pm
Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Number Six » Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:54 pm

Just read the comments on this decision by other readers, many people stated that appeals courts make backward decisions like this contrary to the collective will of punishing insider trading.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)

'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)

User avatar
JamesVincent
A Councilor of the Kabosh
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:01 am

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby JamesVincent » Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:02 pm

Number Six wrote:Just read the comments on this decision by other readers, many people stated that appeals courts make backward decisions like this contrary to the collective will of punishing insider trading.


Jeffrey wrote:Based on reading the article, the appeals court did the right thing. The problem seems to the law is super lax.


The Appeals court ruled on law, not the collective will. If the law is funky or not broad enough the court cannot change it, only note that, in their opinion, the law needs changed.
"Just knowing we're in the same genus makes me embarrassed to call myself Homo." Professor Farnsworth

Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1434
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Brea, CA

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Arthur Rubin » Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:42 pm

I've often thought that the "insider trading" laws were so badly written so that neither intent nor attempt at gain was required. Apparently, the court agreed that that was improper.
Last edited by Arthur Rubin on Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: clean up grammar
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95

User avatar
Number Six
Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
Posts: 1107
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:35 pm
Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Number Six » Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:47 pm

JamesVincent wrote:
Number Six wrote:Just read the comments on this decision by other readers, many people stated that appeals courts make backward decisions like this contrary to the collective will of punishing insider trading.


Jeffrey wrote:Based on reading the article, the appeals court did the right thing. The problem seems to the law is super lax.


The Appeals court ruled on law, not the collective will. If the law is funky or not broad enough the court cannot change it, only note that, in their opinion, the law needs changed.


The law relies on collective will for the greater good, it is not some theoretical and impractical construct. The only people backing this reversal are those with a bias to do so. Just read the reactions, thinking people will continue to pull out of stocks.

Just wait until they water down Dodd-Frank further: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/ ... dget-bill/
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)

'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)

rosvicl
Stowaway
Stowaway
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2013 1:29 am

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby rosvicl » Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:53 pm

Disagreeing with a court decision is different from having evidence that the court is corrupt.

If laws are too lax, that's something to take to the legislature. It's not as though Congress has created a set of perfect laws that the courts are then messing up. Sometimes courts even say "if you want X result, you need to change the law in this way," and the legislature does nothing. There are a lot of things I'm not happy about with the current Supreme Court; in some of those cases, Congress could have passed new legislation to fix those problems, and didn't. In others, it's governors and legislators who are using the dubious court rulings. There's nothing in the current rules about eminent domain that requires a municipality to take private property and hand it to a favored developer, for example.

Hyrion
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 615
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 2:33 pm

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Hyrion » Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:07 pm

Number Six wrote:The only people backing this reversal are those with a bias to do so.

You are incorrect. I currently (based on what little I know of the case and ruling) back the decision and have no bias for said position. Such all-encompassing statements are usually very wrong.

I'm a Canadian whose only investment is in a company in Canada. I have no access to insider information in said company and do not want such access. Given the situation, the ruling, the US Laws surrounding the ruling, the companies and individuals involved - there is absolutely no relationship to me.

If you wish to use the term "bias" in it's broadest sense rather than in the sense of negative bias which is usually how it is applied - then my only bias is that I am an absolute firm believer in equal application of existing Law applied to everyone no matter what their position in Society is. However, in that broadest sense, you too have your own biases relative to the situation. So if a broadly defined bias is wrong, it also applies to yourself.

Is the currently Law badly written? According the media I've read, it does appear so. But the correct location to change the Law (other then Laws that present a Constitutional breach) is in talking to your political representation.... it's not the Courts. There are very sound reasons behind separation of powers. It is not within the Powers of the Courts to make Law.

Should the two be guilty of a financial crime?

Being completely unfamiliar with the case and evidence to support such a finding: My only position on the subject is "Innocent until proven guilty".

User avatar
Number Six
Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
Posts: 1107
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:35 pm
Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Number Six » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:22 am

I'll leave to the lawyers, pro and con, it just seems to me that the cases were being thrown out on relatively small matters and that they were engaged in insider trading. Possibly the DA is over-zealous, I would just hate to see the other cases unravel.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)

'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)

Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1434
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Brea, CA

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Arthur Rubin » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:30 am

And people say the NY Times isn't "liberal". If it weren't for the names of the criminals defendants being the same, I would have thought that the NY Times and CNBC were talking about different cases entirely.
Last edited by Arthur Rubin on Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: adjust spacing
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95

Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2524
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:16 am

Re: Insider Trading Convictions Reversed on Appeal

Postby Jeffrey » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:04 pm

it just seems to me that the cases were being thrown out on relatively small matters and that they were engaged in insider trading


Point #2. I agree it definitely was insider trading.

Point #1. The issue is explained in the articles:

the act of insider trading is not explicitly prohibited in a federal statute. In its place, a patchwork of legal opinions and regulations define the law...

in order to sustain a conviction for insider trading, the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the tippee knew that an insider disclosed confidential information and that he did so in exchange for a personal benefit


This seems to be purely the legislatures fault for making the requirements for a conviction so strict.

If I'm reading this right, you can have the hypothetical case of me operating a hedge fund. I get a tip from an employee that works at a publicly traded company saying next quarters numbers will be good. I buy a ton of stock, make a killing. But since I did not know that the employee was breaking a confidentiality agreement, I'm off the hook despite clearly making money off insider information. Or even if I know 100% that the information is confidential, as long as I don't know the person feeding me the information isn't doing it for a benefit, IE me paying him for it or him getting a benefit indirectly from my trade, it's not a crime.


Return to “THE DILIGIZER BOARD -- Securities Fraud -- Due Diligence in Finance”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests