Controversial IRS official retires

Practical and Practice issues for Professionals who practice in the area of taxation. Moral, social and economic issues relating to taxes, including international issues, the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, state tax issues, etc. Not for "tax protestor" issues, which should be posted in the "tax protestor" forum above. The advice or opinion given herein should not be relied on for any purpose whatsoever. Also examines cookie-cutter deals that have no economic substance but exist only to generate losses, as marketed by everybody from solo practitioner tax lawyers to the major accounting firms.
User avatar
AFTP
The Voice of a Free Quatloosia
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:19 am
Location: 1040-USA

Controversial IRS official retires

Postby AFTP » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:04 pm

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/23/20663004-controversial-irs-official-retires?lite

People are saying she retired because she wanted her pension.
If convicted she'd lose it.

I do hope if she did anything illegal she loses big time.
Whenever you hear a man speak of his love for his Country, it is a sign he expects to be paid for it. – H. L. Mencken

Death and Taxes. Ya Think?

AndyK
Illuminatian Revenue Supremo Emeritus
Posts: 1299
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:13 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby AndyK » Mon Sep 23, 2013 11:36 pm

AFTP wrote:People are saying she retired because she wanted her pension.
If convicted she'd lose it.

I do hope if she did anything illegal she loses big time.


Convicted of what? Even if she violated one of the "deadly sins" for IRS employees and was terminated, or even jailed, she'd keep all the pension benefits she had earned. She'd even be able to collect her pension payments while in prison. In any case, there hasn't been the first word about charging anyone asociated with this issue with any crime.

AFTP: Get over it. You don't have all the facts related to this issue -- just what you get through the media spin. It will take a year or two for all the dust to settle and any charges to be placed.
Taxes are the price we pay for a free society and to cover the responsibilities of the evaders

User avatar
JamesVincent
A Councilor of the Kabosh
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:01 am

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby JamesVincent » Mon Sep 23, 2013 11:46 pm

Only thing known for certain is that people reported issues and she pleaded the fifth. Until something goes beyond that not much else to look at here.
"Just knowing we're in the same genus makes me embarrassed to call myself Homo." Professor Farnsworth

User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 6591
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2003 12:48 am
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby The Observer » Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:35 am

Rep. Sander Levin is stating that the IRS' internal investigation concluded that Lerner was "neglectful in her duties" and recommended that she be fired. At this point it is a simple conclusion that Lerner decided to retire rather than be fired and carry around additional stigma, especially if she decided to look for work in the private sector.

I wouldn't be too surprised to see her resurface in the future with one of the big accounting firms.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff

operabuff
Captain
Captain
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 3:14 pm

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby operabuff » Sat Jun 14, 2014 6:31 pm

Now it seems that the IRS is unable to retrieve any emails that Lerner may have sent to individuals outside of the IRS prior to 2011. This may add gasoline to the fire that seemed mostly out, because the Service apparently can't show that she had no contact with administration officials outside of the IRS. It's difficult to prove a negative in any event, but the IRS just doesn't seem to be able to put a foot right on this issue.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... ml?hpid=z5

User avatar
JamesVincent
A Councilor of the Kabosh
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:01 am

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby JamesVincent » Sat Jun 14, 2014 7:19 pm

They can't retrieve them from the actual mail server?
"Just knowing we're in the same genus makes me embarrassed to call myself Homo." Professor Farnsworth

User avatar
AFTP
The Voice of a Free Quatloosia
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:19 am
Location: 1040-USA

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby AFTP » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:42 pm

Now it seems that the IRS is unable to retrieve any emails that Lerner may have sent to individuals outside of the IRS prior to 2011.


Sounds like a blatant cover up.
Whenever you hear a man speak of his love for his Country, it is a sign he expects to be paid for it. – H. L. Mencken



Death and Taxes. Ya Think?

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10645
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby notorial dissent » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:28 pm

Let's just say it sounds reminiscent of a CTC educated return.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

AndyK
Illuminatian Revenue Supremo Emeritus
Posts: 1299
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:13 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby AndyK » Mon Jun 16, 2014 4:21 pm

AFTP wrote:
Now it seems that the IRS is unable to retrieve any emails that Lerner may have sent to individuals outside of the IRS prior to 2011.


Sounds like a blatant cover up.


Sounds a lot more like expired retention dates for backup tapes and / or one or more common errors by the tape handlers.

Then again, AFTP has never found a stone without a conspiracy under it.
Taxes are the price we pay for a free society and to cover the responsibilities of the evaders

User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 6591
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2003 12:48 am
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby The Observer » Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:39 pm

AndyK wrote:Sounds a lot more like expired retention dates for backup tapes and / or one or more common errors by the tape handlers.

Then again, AFTP has never found a stone without a conspiracy under it.


No, it sounds more like that the problem that IRS Counsel has been warning the various operating divisions about for years, in that IRS employees need to do a better job in backing up and preserving their electronic records, in particular e-mails. There are too many laptop users out there that think that their hard drive is immune to failure until the day that it does fail. Then they expect IT to pull a miracle out of nowhere in resurrecting the data on the drive.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff

User avatar
Lambkin
Warder of the Quatloosian Gibbet
Posts: 1202
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:43 pm

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby Lambkin » Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:46 pm

I imagine corruption occurs at the IRS from time to time, but I'll bet on blundering incompetence and hide-bound bureaucratic inertia any day.

User avatar
AFTP
The Voice of a Free Quatloosia
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:19 am
Location: 1040-USA

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby AFTP » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:57 pm

AndyK wrote:
AFTP wrote:
Now it seems that the IRS is unable to retrieve any emails that Lerner may have sent to individuals outside of the IRS prior to 2011.


Sounds like a blatant cover up.


Sounds a lot more like expired retention dates for backup tapes and / or one or more common errors by the tape handlers.

Then again, AFTP has never found a stone without a conspiracy under it.


That is simply not fair.
The average person is getting very sick and tired of the lies and convenient "losing" of things in this Govt. when it comes to so called transparency and telling the truth.
The people deserve better. We are fed up and being fed up with this dysfunctional Govt. doesn't make someone looking for "a conspiracy under it."! :naughty:
Whenever you hear a man speak of his love for his Country, it is a sign he expects to be paid for it. – H. L. Mencken



Death and Taxes. Ya Think?

User avatar
webhick
Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
Posts: 3868
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:41 am

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby webhick » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:29 pm

The Observer wrote:There are too many laptop users out there that think that their hard drive is immune to failure until the day that it does fail. Then they expect IT to pull a miracle out of nowhere in resurrecting the data on the drive.


It's almost like you're writing my biography. And before you get to the bit where I pull a miracle out of my ass please remember that I've temporarily resurrected more hard drives by putting them in the freezer for several hours than I have by trying to pass them through my colon.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10645
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby notorial dissent » Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:34 am

So we have to add Re-Animatrix to your list of job titles or is that actually rankings???

Clever idea by the way.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

operabuff
Captain
Captain
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 3:14 pm

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby operabuff » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:59 am

Here's a fuller explanation from the IRS of what happened to the emails:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the ... r/?hpid=z5

AndyK
Illuminatian Revenue Supremo Emeritus
Posts: 1299
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:13 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby AndyK » Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:36 pm

Note to AFTP:

Are the facts of the issue merely another part of the conspiracy and cover-up or are they a reasonable, rational explanation for what happened.

As a sort of aside: In response to Tax Notes Today winning several FOIA / disclosure lawsuits against the IRS, the Office of Chief Counsel [which -- at least until the end of 2011 -- maintained a separate computer network and e-mail system from the rest of the IRS] instituted a computer-supported program of e-mail retention.

In this system, ANY e-mail message originating in Chief Counsel which constituted legal advice, policy statements, presonnel actions, and several other categories was automatically copied to a separate mail server, categorized and indexed. These servers are multiply redundant and have backup tapes maintained indefinitely.

The remainder of the IRS (as of 11/30/2011) had yet to implement any such system BUT they did institute a program of indefinite e-mail server back-up retention.

Just as a comparison, how many private sector companies -- where e-mail messages habe been determined to be legal records; documentation of SEC violations; evidence in price-fixing schemes; proof of age discrimination; etc -- are held to the same standards as AFTP woould apply to the government?
Taxes are the price we pay for a free society and to cover the responsibilities of the evaders

operabuff
Captain
Captain
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 3:14 pm

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby operabuff » Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:37 pm

The IRS has a National Archives approved record retention policy (see IRM 1.15.1 et seq.). Records are categorized and a specific retention period is set for each category. Records judged to have lasting historical importance, e.g. regulation files, are designated as permanent. Such historical records are supposed to be shipped off to the Archives so that they can be properly preserved.

The government's record maintenance system originated in a world of paper records and is gradually being amended to take into account the increasing prevalence of electronic records. So, for example, because national office case files mostly exist in paper form, related emails are supposed to be printed off and incorporated in the paper file. Twenty years from now, probably all of the files will be electronically stored, but the conversion process is slow, particularly in a time of reduced budgets. As they say, it's hard to focus on draining the swamp when you're up to your "elbows" in alligators. Record maintenance definitely falls into the draining the swamp category and almost always takes second place to dealing with the crisis du jour.

That makes life much more complicated when the crisis du jour involves the production of records in response to discovery, FOIA, or congressional inquiries.

User avatar
AFTP
The Voice of a Free Quatloosia
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:19 am
Location: 1040-USA

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby AFTP » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:50 pm

Are the facts of the issue merely another part of the conspiracy and cover-up or are they a reasonable, rational explanation for what happened.


Frankly, I don't know.

What I do know is the perception of what is happening.
With all the blatant lying by the Govt. to the people you can't help but feeling something is very wrong here.

Maybe you have a job where you see things in a clearer light.
But as I said, to the average Joe it seems very fishy.
No conspiracy, just observation.

I think it would behoove you to place yourself in the average Americans shoes and see though their eyes for a while.
Maybe then you'll understand their disillusionment.
Whenever you hear a man speak of his love for his Country, it is a sign he expects to be paid for it. – H. L. Mencken



Death and Taxes. Ya Think?

User avatar
Cathulhu
Order of the Quatloos, Brevet First Class
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:51 pm

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby Cathulhu » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:52 pm

Lambkin wrote:I imagine corruption occurs at the IRS from time to time, but I'll bet on blundering incompetence and hide-bound bureaucratic inertia any day.


Frankly, I think Lambkin nailed it. The folks in my office would always make me call the IT guy, because I could get along with him and they were utterly at sea. Didn't speak same language--he spoke fluent techie, and they didn't understand him. And I could see his life, dealing with non-listening idiots who expect miracles.

Makes me respect Webhick all the more. Hail, Webhick!
Goodness is about what you do. Not what you pray to. T. Pratchett
Always be a moving target. L.M. Bujold

Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7172
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Controversial IRS official retires

Postby Famspear » Tue Jun 17, 2014 3:41 pm

AFTP wrote:...I think it would behoove you to place yourself in the average Americans shoes and see though their eyes for a while.
Maybe then you'll understand their disillusionment.


Gee, who exactly are these "average Americans", and how do we find one of them? I'd sure like to meet one.

Come on.

I'm the grandson of a south Louisiana rice farmer. My grandparents had little in the way of worldly possessions. My other grandfather was a Methodist minister, but they didn't have much, either. My mother died when I was a kid. After she died, my dad never re-married, and he struggled to raise four children, and did a good job. As kids, we didn't have a lot of the toys that other kids had. At one point, we went to church on Sunday wearing "flip flops" for shoes. I grew up in the Deep South and I didn't live in an air conditioned home until I was grown and moved away from home.

In my life, I have received only one government hand-out that comes to mind: The interest that the government paid on my student loans while I was in college and law school.

The fact that I worked for what I have accomplished does not make me not be an average American. Indeed, working for what you have is very typically "average American."

I'm just curious, AFTP. Which posters here in the Quatloos forum do you consider to be "not average Americans" who would need to "place themselves" in the "shoes" of people who are average Americans?

Edit: And, AFTP, since your comment was directed to AndyK, why do you think it necessary or appropriate to lecture AndyK on "placing" himself in the "shoes" of "average Americans"? Is there some reason that AndyK cannot relate to the plight of "average Americans"?
...why is anyone in this [losthorizons] community paying the least attention to...'Larry Williams' [Famspear], or other purveyors of disinformation from...quatloos? – Pete Hendrickson, former inmate 15406-039, Fed’l Bureau of Prisons


Return to “Tax Practice & Policy and Tax Shelters”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest