Inherited IRAs in play for bankruptcy creditors: USSC

Practical and Practice issues for Professionals who practice in the area of taxation. Moral, social and economic issues relating to taxes, including international issues, the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, state tax issues, etc. Not for "tax protestor" issues, which should be posted in the "tax protestor" forum above. The advice or opinion given herein should not be relied on for any purpose whatsoever. Also examines cookie-cutter deals that have no economic substance but exist only to generate losses, as marketed by everybody from solo practitioner tax lawyers to the major accounting firms.
jg
Fed Chairman of the Quatloosian Reserve
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 2:25 am

Inherited IRAs in play for bankruptcy creditors: USSC

Postby jg » Wed Jun 18, 2014 1:10 am

BY NICK BROWN
Thu Jun 12, 2014 1:51pm EDT
"In a unanimous opinion, the nation's highest court held that IRAs inherited by someone other than a spouse cannot be considered retirement funds, because beneficiaries cannot invest additional money or delay distributions until retirement."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/12/us-bankruptcyiras-scotus-idUSKBN0EN1TA20140612
“Where there is an income tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less on the same amount of income.” — Plato

Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7197
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Inherited IRAs in play for bankruptcy creditors: USSC

Postby Famspear » Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:45 pm

From the Supreme Court’s opinion:

Petitioners’ primary argument is that funds in an inherited IRA are retirement funds because—regardless of whether they currently sit in an account bearing the legal characteristics of a fund set aside for retirement—they did so at an earlier moment in time. After all, petitioners point out, “the initial owner” of the account “set aside the funds in question for retirement by depositing them in a ”traditional or Roth IRA. Brief for Petitioners 21. And “[t]he [initial] owner’s death does not in any way affect the funds in the account.” Ibid.

We disagree. In ordinary usage, to speak of a person’s “retirement funds” implies that the funds are currently in an account set aside for retirement, not that they were set aside for that purpose at some prior date by an entirely different person. Under petitioners’ contrary logic, if an individual withdraws money from a traditional IRA and gives it to a friend who then deposits it into a checking account, that money should be forever deemed “retirement funds” because it was originally set aside for retirement. That is plainly incorrect.


--from Clark v. Rameker, p. 8, slip op., case no. 13–299, U.S. Supreme Court (June 12, 2014).
...why is anyone in this [losthorizons] community paying the least attention to...'Larry Williams' [Famspear], or other purveyors of disinformation from...quatloos? – Pete Hendrickson, former inmate 15406-039, Fed’l Bureau of Prisons

Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7197
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Inherited IRAs in play for bankruptcy creditors: USSC

Postby Famspear » Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:31 am

I believe that an inherited IRA could still be exempt in bankruptcy if the debtor is claiming the exemption under a state statute by way of Bankruptcy Code section 522(b)(3)(A) -- if the state statute has language similar to that found in Texas Property Code section 42.0021.

Section 42.0021 exempts (among other things) inherited IRAs and inherited Roth IRAs, but contains no specific language requiring that these IRAs be considered "retirement funds."

The holding in Clark v. Rameker relates only to a debtor's claim for exemption of an inherited IRA under 522(b)(3)(C), which statute contains the "retirement funds" language. The debtors in that case were claiming under 522(b)(3)(C), not under 522(b)(3)(A).

To be more specific: neither 522(b)(3)(A) nor Texas Property Code section 42.0021 contains any express language indicating that an IRA (whether inherited or not) must be a "retirement fund" to be exempt. Further, as amended through September 1, 2013, Texas section 42.0021 specifically exempts "inherited" IRAs and "inherited" Roth IRAs.

So, a practitioner in Texas (or in a state having a provision similar to Texas Property Code section 42.0021) should consider this when deciding how to advise the client to claim exemption for an inherited IRA.
...why is anyone in this [losthorizons] community paying the least attention to...'Larry Williams' [Famspear], or other purveyors of disinformation from...quatloos? – Pete Hendrickson, former inmate 15406-039, Fed’l Bureau of Prisons


Return to “Tax Practice & Policy and Tax Shelters”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest