Discrimination lawsuits

Practical and Practice issues for Professionals who practice in the area of taxation. Moral, social and economic issues relating to taxes, including international issues, the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, state tax issues, etc. Not for "tax protestor" issues, which should be posted in the "tax protestor" forum above. The advice or opinion given herein should not be relied on for any purpose whatsoever. Also examines cookie-cutter deals that have no economic substance but exist only to generate losses, as marketed by everybody from solo practitioner tax lawyers to the major accounting firms.
Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1458
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Brea, CA

Discrimination lawsuits

Postby Arthur Rubin » Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:20 am

I was just wondering if any tax preparers who have "difficult client" fees have been sued under antidiscrimination laws, the client claiming the fee increase being due to membership in a protected class, rather than for just being a pain in the ass.
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95

User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 6653
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2003 12:48 am
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Discrimination lawsuits

Postby The Observer » Fri Apr 07, 2017 3:44 pm

Wouldn't it be easier to get rid of said clients by simply completing their return and showing that they owe several hundred million in taxes? At that point they may simply conclude that the preparer is incompetent and take their business elsewhere.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff

Judge Roy Bean
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Posts: 3540
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: West of the Pecos
Contact:

Re: Discrimination lawsuits

Postby Judge Roy Bean » Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:20 pm

Arthur Rubin wrote:I was just wondering if any tax preparers who have "difficult client" fees have been sued under antidiscrimination laws, the client claiming the fee increase being due to membership in a protected class, rather than for just being a pain in the ass.

Why even itemize them?
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10910
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Discrimination lawsuits

Postby notorial dissent » Fri Apr 07, 2017 6:03 pm

Yeah, just double the fee and then not accept them back.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
webhick
Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
Posts: 3880
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:41 am
Contact:

Re: Discrimination lawsuits

Postby webhick » Sat Apr 08, 2017 4:29 am

We just used to not return their calls for future work.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie

User avatar
webhick
Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
Posts: 3880
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:41 am
Contact:

Re: Discrimination lawsuits

Postby webhick » Sat Apr 08, 2017 4:30 am

Arthur Rubin wrote:I was just wondering if any tax preparers who have "difficult client" fees have been sued under antidiscrimination laws, the client claiming the fee increase being due to membership in a protected class, rather than for just being a pain in the ass.


Is being "difficult" a protected class? Is it because of a mental illness or something?
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie

rogfulton
Caveat Venditor
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:08 am
Location: No longer behind the satellite dish, second door along - in fact, not even in the same building.

Re: Discrimination lawsuits

Postby rogfulton » Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:20 pm

About 12 years ago, I had a woman come in wanting to file as head of household. The software we were using required entering the social security number of the primary taxpayer to begin the process and it brought up an existing return that had already been submitted.

It turns out that her husband had already filed as head of household through our same office and had listed her (with ssn) as someone who could also claim the children listed on his return. When I asked her about it she said yeah, that's how they had been filing for a number of years - he claims two of the kids, she claims the other two. She also added that they didn't file jointly because they attended different universities and lived apart for the school year.

When I told I would not be able to file her return that way, she got a bit abusive. I told her I would be happy to amend her husband's return at no charge (he was sitting there next to her), they both started getting loud. As we were in a kiosk inside a WalMart, this caught the attention of store security. After I returned her paperwork, they were escorted from the store and told they were banned from returning.

As they were leaving, the husband turned back to me and threatened a discrimination lawsuit. I handed him one of my cards and told him "please do". As soon as they were gone, I gave their information to my manager and she notified the IRS. Needless to say, I never heard anything more about it but I have no idea if the company did.
"No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we require him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right; not asked as a favor."
- President Theodore Roosevelt


Return to “Tax Practice & Policy and Tax Shelters”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest