Hendrickson Conviction Aff'd; Sentencing Remanded

[wserra]

I may have the dates wrong, but my impression is that, if Hendrickson files for certiorari with the Supreme Court, he could actually delay his own release.

A cert petition must be filed within 90 days of the judgment or order, not of the mandate. Supreme Court Rule 13. While Hendrickson's rehearing blather might have delayed the mandate had it been timely, the clock for the cert petition would still be running. The date of the affirmance was February 8, 2012. A cert petition definitely won't delay the mandate, and so I doubt it would delay the resentence.

More blather in the Sixth Circuit, on the other hand . . .

[wserra]

The mandate was issued on March 12. From the district court docket:

03/12/2012 92 MANDATE from U.S. Court of Appeals - Sixth Circuit as to 70 Notice of Appeal filed by Peter Eric Hendrickson, Doreen M. Hendrickson [Appeal Case Number 10-1824] (KKra) (Entered: 03/13/2012)

That's the injunction/contempt case. The criminal appeal is 10-1726. No mandate yet.

I know, I know, Hendrickson loses so many you need a scorecard.

[notorial dissent]

At the rate he is going, he is still going to be appealing a sentence he has already served and been released from, but since he obviously has no sense whatsoever, why should this come as a surprise?

[jcolvin2]

The mandate was issued on March 12. From the district court docket:

03/12/2012 92 MANDATE from U.S. Court of Appeals - Sixth Circuit as to 70 Notice of Appeal filed by Peter Eric Hendrickson, Doreen M. Hendrickson [Appeal Case Number 10-1824] (KKra) (Entered: 03/13/2012)

That's the injunction/contempt case. The criminal appeal is 10-1726. No mandate yet.

I know, I know, Hendrickson loses so many you need a scorecard.

My bad. The timing seemed right - about 45 days from the Sixth Circuit opinion in the criminal case. It does make sense that the Circuit would hold the mandate until it ruled on the (late) Petition for Rehearing.

[Famspear]

I may have the dates wrong, but my impression is that, if Hendrickson files for certiorari with the Supreme Court, he could actually delay his own release.

Which, of course, in the Hendricksonian Universe, would be a victory for him!

[ashlynne39]

Has anyone broken the news at Lost Minds yet?

[Famspear]

Has anyone broken the news at Lost Minds yet?

I don't think so.

By the way, the losthorizons web site appears to be "down" right now (about 1:00 pm central time, Saturday, March 24, 2012).

[Dr. Caligari]

Has anyone broken the news at Lost Minds yet?

I don't think so.

By the way, the losthorizons web site appears to be "down" right now (about 1:00 pm central time, Saturday, March 24, 2012).

Still down late Sunday afternoon. But I visited the site Friday and--more than a month and a half after the Appeals Court's ruling-- no one had a clue. Which, I guess, is a good summary of Lost Horizons: tax law for the clueless.

[notorial dissent]

Actually, they're pretty much all around clueless, no real specialization that I have been able to discern.

[Gregg]

Assuming Pete manages to get out of prison, and stay out long enough to return to LH, we need to get a pool going on the members he exiles for straying from the "Pete is all and knows all, and anything else is heresy" dogma.

My picks for early banishment:

Skankbeat for "common law"

Libre (the idiot of many names) for the Van Pelt Collection

[Famspear]

Assuming Pete manages to get out of prison, and stay out long enough to return to LH, we need to get a pool going on the members he exiles for straying from the "Pete is all and knows all, and anything else is heresy" dogma.

My picks for early banishment:

Skankbeat for "common law"

Libre (the idiot of many names) for the Van Pelt Collection

I second both of those picks.

[Gregg]

Just to refresh my memory, is Pete in contempt on the order to file returns for the years he was convicted for? If he is, will that prevent his release?

[Famspear]

I notice that Preposterous Pete's web site has now been down for (at least) over four days (since at least mid-day Saturday).

[Dezcad]

Resentencing is set for 4/11/12 @1PM:

03/27/2012 124 MANDATE from U.S. Court of Appeals - Sixth Circuit as to Peter Hendrickson re 104 Notice of Appeal filed by Peter Hendrickson [Appeal Case Number 10-1726] (KKra) (Entered: 03/28/2012)
03/28/2012 125 ORDER SETTING DATE FOR RESENTENCING as to Peter Hendrickson. ( Resentencing set for 4/11/2012 01:00 PM before District Judge Gerald E. Rosen). Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (RGun) (Entered: 03/28/2012)

[Famspear]

Resentencing is set for 4/11/12 @1PM....

And the Haughty Hendrickson's losthorizons "Cracking the Code" tax scam internet forum has now been down for over 120 hours.

I'm sure this will be the first thing Pete will fix when he gets out of prison.

[Dr. Caligari]

I notice that Preposterous Pete's web site has now been down for (at least) over four days (since at least mid-day Saturday).

I'm wondering if his lawyer advised that it be shut down until after the re-sentencing.

[webhick]

I notice that Preposterous Pete's web site has now been down for (at least) over four days (since at least mid-day Saturday).

I'm wondering if his lawyer advised that it be shut down until after the re-sentencing.

I doubt his lawyer advised him to delete one of the three files (or is it two...can't remember) related to the sessions table on his phpBB installation which would effectively bring the forum down for technical reasons. Especially since the forum seemed unstable prior to this error. Database was probably restored from a corrupted backup.

[notorial dissent]

I notice that Preposterous Pete's web site has now been down for (at least) over four days (since at least mid-day Saturday).

I'm wondering if his lawyer advised that it be shut down until after the re-sentencing.

Seriously???? Hendrickson actually follow the advice of counsel??? Seriously??? The next thing you'll be telling me is that the House of Representatives has come to an agreement that the sun is shining outside.

[rogfulton]

Seriously???? Hendrickson actually follow the advice of counsel??? Seriously??? The next thing you'll be telling me is that the House of Representatives has come to an agreement that the sun is shining outside.

Depends on what your definition of 'is' is.

[Pottapaug1938]

I don't see how Hendrickson can possibly get himself to accept the advice of his counsel. To do so, he would have to admit that he has been a huge [southbound end of a northbound horse], and that he has made a train wreck of his life.

I think that he'll essentially "double down on 'Stupid'". it's all he has left.