Do my dogs pay taxes? No.
Can my dogs be sued? No.
Can my dogs be bankrupted? No.
Can my dogs be prosecuted? No.
Can my dogs be jailed? No.
![Snicker :snicker:](./images/smilies/icon_snicker.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
FifyJeffrey wrote:God damn maam...i also think its a good idea to change gender ala kate of gaia.
Are you so sure about that?? http://www.businessinsider.com/trouble- ... ied-2011-6longdog wrote:Changing gender isn't going to help... You need to change species.
Do my dogs pay taxes? No.
Can my dogs be sued? No.
Can my dogs be bankrupted? No.
Can my dogs be prosecuted? No.
Can my dogs be jailed? No.
And we should not. Plumbing his depths is what judges and big swarthy inmates are for.notorial dissent wrote:I don't think we've even begun to plumb the depths of Jimmy's stupidity and cupidity.
The thought did cross my mind that if you have no name how do you sign cheques?mufc1959 wrote:One-Cell must be the only person to have both lost the name and obtained a passport. He also took out a credit agreement through Barclays Partner Finance to buy his kitchen in 2014, and, far from 'losing the name' attempted to pay off his debts with WeRe cheques, thus acknowledging the existence of both himself and the debts.
Must be why he's thinking of the sex change....if he were to have a baby (obviousky with a willing like-minded woman) and kept it locked up in their home until they were an adult, teaching them survival techniques, then have them go out on their own, living covertly of the land, evading contact with anyone their entire lives, then probably they wouldn't ever be bothered with a council tax bill.
Comes under the heading of if you don't pay your bills, rates, taxes, etc, the courts eventually get involved, and then usually so do the banks if you own anything pledged, so yeah it's a conspiracy of sorts, all right out there in the open. Honestly, how does he dress and feed himself? I still can't believe he can tie his own shoes.rumpelstilzchen wrote:One Cell wrote:I find it amusing that One Cell claims it is a conspiracy when in reality the whole process could not be any more transparent.its easy money for these scum. there all in it together. council say i owe money courts aggree and police come get you. and then the bank join in and give them your house. yeah and conspiracies don't exist my arse. lol
The law states you must pay CT, jimmy. The reason the court agreed with the council is because the courts apply the law you idiot. The reason the police came for you is not because you owe CT. They came because you were not complying with the law regarding bankruptcy and a warrant had been issued for your arrest. Despite your claim that you are not bankrupt.....you are.
Jimmy it did not work for you until they produced that picture. You had already been made bankrupt, them confirming your identity was the result of your stupidity in not acknowledging you were about to be made bankrupt, and then when you were, your refusal to co-operate with the OR. Your now bankrupt and your house is in the hands of the OR and you blame the fact it has happened on a copy of your passport. If you had no passport they would have ID'd you another way, fingerprints if needed, and you would still be bankrupt and minus a house. By all means though keep the entertainment going, try the no name tactic again, call yourself Bertie Bassett, or Kermit the Fool, hell the Judge may even call you Kermit, but he knows who created the debt and who you really are.Re: it's all a game - games have rules; why not learn the rules
Postby jimmyw » Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:15 pm
yeah i have no doubt that will work in some cases. and it worked for me till they produced a picture of my passport and proceded to them re-summons the name. thick lad me went back and recontracted. its having the nerve to go through with it, but i bottled it. but i have learned my lesson and will not be using the name again once i'm out of this mess. get your name off all of their system any way you can... do it quick or slow but everytie you use that name its flags up in there system. this is why i'm convince one of the best strategies we can use is TO IGNORE THEM. they hate it it makes them go beserk bonkers... because if enough people do it. it will all collapse. use a 2nd name or many like i do, you have every right to name yourself and not let anyone else name you. i also think its a good idea to change gender ala kate of gaia.
Not easy to 'lose the name' when it's attached to a property you want to protect, think this is just beginning to dawn on Jimmy, he not only didn't lose the name he's left his property wide open to seizure.longdog wrote:The idea of 'losing the name' when faced with impending legal action has a certain amount of very wonky logic to it. "If I refuse to give my name they can't touch me" is completely and utterly wrong but you can see how it's supposed to work.
Once the court case is over and you have (inevitably) lost refusing to 'be the name' is a big logic-free zone and simply an open invitation to the 'corrupt powers that be' to give you a damned good shafting in the confident knowledge that unless you suddenly find your name again you are utterly powerless to fight back.
That's the point I am ham fistedly trying to make , Quantam3xdense is as usual encouraging one cell on and claiming he has everything he is associated with registered in the name of a pet etc.AndyPandy wrote:Not easy to 'lose the name' when it's attached to a property you want to protect, think this is just beginning to dawn on Jimmy, he not only didn't lose the name he's left his property wide open to seizure.longdog wrote:The idea of 'losing the name' when faced with impending legal action has a certain amount of very wonky logic to it. "If I refuse to give my name they can't touch me" is completely and utterly wrong but you can see how it's supposed to work.
Once the court case is over and you have (inevitably) lost refusing to 'be the name' is a big logic-free zone and simply an open invitation to the 'corrupt powers that be' to give you a damned good shafting in the confident knowledge that unless you suddenly find your name again you are utterly powerless to fight back.
On behalf of furries everywhere, please discontinue this line of argument. Thanks to Zootopia/Zootropolis we're finally starting to get a modest amount of good press. Jimmy One-cell in a fursuit would not be helpful (though it would make it very difficult for him to type, which would be a plus).longdog wrote:Changing gender isn't going to help... You need to change species.
Do my dogs pay taxes? No.
Can my dogs be sued? No.
Can my dogs be bankrupted? No.
Can my dogs be prosecuted? No.
Can my dogs be jailed? No.
All this time Jim's been trying to lose the name, when he really needs to lose his face.it worked for me till they produced a picture of my passport
Most furries are not fursuiters. In any case, no one is suggesting that Jimmy adopt a fursona. Or even that he needs a good yiffing. But he might benefit from some mentoring from Dante the SovDog.KickahaOta wrote:On behalf of furries everywhere, please discontinue this line of argument. Thanks to Zootopia/Zootropolis we're finally starting to get a modest amount of good press. Jimmy One-cell in a fursuit would not be helpful (though it would make it very difficult for him to type, which would be a plus).longdog wrote:Changing gender isn't going to help... You need to change species.
Do my dogs pay taxes? No.
Can my dogs be sued? No.
Can my dogs be bankrupted? No.
Can my dogs be prosecuted? No.
Can my dogs be jailed? No.
Jimmy wished he hadn't listened to people on the net so muchJeffrey wrote:All this time Jim's been trying to lose the name, when he really needs to lose his face.it worked for me till they produced a picture of my passport
He's also going to sign on soon. How're you going to manage that, if you've lost the name, Jimbo? And how will that help your bankruptcy, if you're 'officially' on benefits? There'll be no possibility of paying off your creditors.rumpelstilzchen wrote:jimmy demonstrates in that video what a complete and utter idiot he really is. He complains about the elderly who have savings having to pay for residential home care while at the same time he believes he should not have to contribute for any essential services.
If no one contributed every resident in every care home would have to pay the full price for their care, jimmy. You really are an ignoramus.