Mr Crawford has been ruled to be a vexatious litigant, surely this status should preclude him wasting taxpayer resources on spurious FOI requests
![snooty :snooty:](./images/smilies/eusa_snooty.gif)
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Mr Crawford has been ruled to be a vexatious litigant, surely this status should preclude him wasting taxpayer resources on spurious FOI requests
Dear all group members,
I am due to face a 3 day Court trial to determine if I was doing a Duck or a Monkey impression at Tom Crawford Eviction last year on July 2nd. I am charged with racism and the key decision the jury of 12 have to make during this 3 day listed trial is to determine if I did a Daffy Duck Impression or a Monkey impression. They also have to establish and decide if I did the 5 second unrepeated impression – towards Jay Bradley who was just 6 feet away from me or an Afro-Caribbean individual approximately 36-feet away across a road and the other side of a police van.
I am charged with making racist sounds and monkey movements that caused a complaint to be made almost an hour after I was arrested and to an individual I had not met or even knew was there as he was obscured by the police van. The incident happened when I was one of Tom Crawfords supporters who tried to prevent him being evicted on 2nd July last year [2015] – several people were arrested that day including Tom himself; this is the last case connected with that event; all the others have already been convicted. The trial is due to start on Tuesday 11th October 2016 at 10am and is expected to last for 3 days.
I am acting as a self-litigant and have made an application to the court of ‘no case to answer’. I have also made an application for an adjournment – both are which are likely to be heard first thing Tuesday am. “This case is just ‘Quacker’s’ and if it actually goes to trial it will be completely ‘Nuts!”
My witnesses are due to attend on the 2nd day Wednesday or 3rd day Thursday depending on which of the many letters/summonses that have been sent out by my 'no longer acting' solicitors [Lizars], you choose to believe? This includes Tom Crawford and Jay Brad Bradley although my key witness Jay is now on holiday abroad and cannot attend. Because of the confusion as to when the witnesses are required and that a couple of them are not available to attend, I have been granted the chance to explain the reasons needed for an adjournment. Hopefully this will mean that after the hearing Tuesday we will have a proper fixed date set for any pending trial, but this time without the continued confusion created by my precious solicitors.
I feel I am being set up by the Police and the Courts and could face 2 years inside if I am found guilty. If anyone is able to attend and show their support for me – this would be greatly appreciated; feel free to attend wearing Daffy Duck or Bugs Bunny fancy dress or T shirts etc…No Monkeys whatever you do! Namaste & I hope to see some of you there. Andy Pears [aka Daft Daffy Duck!]
If you don't know somebody is there how do you know they are obscured by a van?SteveUK wrote:From Facebook. Mr pears in court
I am charged with making racist sounds and monkey movements that caused a complaint to be made almost an hour after I was arrested and to an individual I had not met or even knew was there as he was obscured by the police van
SteveUK wrote:I slightly suspect the CPS will mess it up like the others and he'll walk. Naturally it'll be proof of the injustices served on team Crawford and further proof of the 'dark forces' trying to get them.
Rumour has it, Jay wants nothing to do with it and left the country yesterdaySkeleton wrote:SteveUK wrote:I slightly suspect the CPS will mess it up like the others and he'll walk. Naturally it'll be proof of the injustices served on team Crawford and further proof of the 'dark forces' trying to get them.
With Jay Brad as his star witness and Andy defending himself Freeman style one would think not, however, I agree with you. I think he will walk but for a different reason. When his arrest arrest video surfaced I thought he was arrested simply to get him out the way before he caused any real trouble or damage.
I wonder if Jay used a WeRe Cheque or some of the compensation he received after buying that mercedes to pay for his jolly upMy witnesses are due to attend on the 2nd day Wednesday or 3rd day Thursday depending on which of the many letters/summonses that have been sent out by my 'no longer acting' solicitors [Lizars], you choose to believe? This includes Tom Crawford and Jay Brad Bradley although my key witness Jay is now on holiday abroad and cannot attend.
I noted the comment to. O'Dreary with his usual "no case to answer" plea that has failed him on more than one occasion, in typical Freetard fashion he is prepared to let someone else have another crack at said theory, but not point out it has already failed.Bones wrote:
Given what his spitting girlfriend did, Mickey should be quiet on telling Andie what to do
Tom Crawford has been trying to get a jury trial for months without success. This guy gets one for doing a duck impression.Andy Pears wrote:I am charged with racism and the key decision the jury of 12 have to make
I have no doubt it is not actually a Jury trial, I think he is lying to be honest. Andy Pears is seeking a moment of fame and to be part of the Crawford's clan. Sadly no Crawford will turn up for this trial or any of his 5 supporters.TheNewSaint wrote:Tom Crawford has been trying to get a jury trial for months without success. This guy gets one for doing a duck impression.Andy Pears wrote:I am charged with racism and the key decision the jury of 12 have to make
TheNewSaint wrote:Tom Crawford has been trying to get a jury trial for months without success. This guy gets one for doing a duck impression.Andy Pears wrote:I am charged with racism and the key decision the jury of 12 have to make
And with that, I must remind UK posters that sub judice rules will apply so don't go wildly speculating about who did what, said what, etc. stick with the court reports (from reliable sources of courseSteveUK wrote:He's listed in crown, not magistrate , getting his jury after all.
Jeffrey wrote:[Tom Crawford] framed the entire eviction in racial terms, claiming the police and authorities were predominantly dark skinned immigrants evicting a white native English family.
Tom can be heard at 1:37 talking about black and "eurasian" officers.
I'm pretty sure Tom was referring to the bailiffsJeffrey wrote:Yeah I know there were white cops, but Tom and others claimed many of the cops were dark skinned and/or Muslims.