"practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
https://m.facebook.com/groups/388605611 ... 3413384693
Seems old Tom has joined the group.
I'm sure his vast court room experiences will elevate the group to further success.
Seems old Tom has joined the group.
I'm sure his vast court room experiences will elevate the group to further success.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Is this guy and JimmyW related ??
Ps I do miss Jimmy, the comedic value was great!!
This is for the £31k debt.Jenny Peterson
Crab Bait, just wondering - have the council sent you a Statutory Demand in relation to this matter?
Like1Hide · 1 hour ago
Crab Bait
Yes they did, but I don't recognise statutory demands.
Ps I do miss Jimmy, the comedic value was great!!
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
I think this one is looking to displace him, and with that amount of debt he may well manage it, does he have anything to actually pay it with? Like a job of property?
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
I don't think we know. IIRC this is the guy who hasn't paid his business rates, so he must have a business but what assets or property he has is unknown at present. But if bailiffs or sheriffs go looking for goods from his business I can't imagine any business being able to surive £30+k of goods being taken without it wrecking the business. (Also, don't forget, that's £30+ of goods at "fire sale" or auction prices)notorial dissent wrote:I think this one is looking to displace him, and with that amount of debt he may well manage it, does he have anything to actually pay it with? Like a job of property?
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
The property referred to on the Council's letter was to 94-96 St Mary's Road, Southampton, which was a nightclub called Cloud Nine, now permanently shut as the site is being redeveloped to flats.ArthurWankspittle wrote:I don't think we know. IIRC this is the guy who hasn't paid his business rates, so he must have a business but what assets or property he has is unknown at present. But if bailiffs or sheriffs go looking for goods from his business I can't imagine any business being able to surive £30+k of goods being taken without it wrecking the business. (Also, don't forget, that's £30+ of goods at "fire sale" or auction prices)notorial dissent wrote:I think this one is looking to displace him, and with that amount of debt he may well manage it, does he have anything to actually pay it with? Like a job of property?
This article talks about its opening in 2014 and who were involved, possible the guy putting up the money, he would probably be the one signing the lease? Photo of them both in second article.
http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/11158833._/
http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/1158979 ... hrown_out/
Or even the previous owner when the club was called Kaos.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Undertones of Freemanism in the comments on the latter link.
Definitely sounds like he/they think they owe the council (business rates) nothing as it appears the business went bust.
I've seen this a few times when businesses go bust, they think any outstanding rate arrears are extinguished, such fools.
Definitely sounds like he/they think they owe the council (business rates) nothing as it appears the business went bust.
I've seen this a few times when businesses go bust, they think any outstanding rate arrears are extinguished, such fools.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
oh dear
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
They still don't understand that Parliament isn't a monarch.
Stupid is as stupid does.
The queen delegates the right of Parliament and that gaurntees parlimentry sovereignty over issues, however she may still not give royal assent to a bill and the EC act on the 1970s was given royal assent! What can these morons understand?
Also then, what happens when we leave the EU and effectively the treaty of Nice is dead!
I cannot fathom the level of stupid some people are!
Stupid is as stupid does.
The queen delegates the right of Parliament and that gaurntees parlimentry sovereignty over issues, however she may still not give royal assent to a bill and the EC act on the 1970s was given royal assent! What can these morons understand?
Also then, what happens when we leave the EU and effectively the treaty of Nice is dead!
I cannot fathom the level of stupid some people are!
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
That is Peter of England isn't it? Looks like the European tour is over.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Pirate Captain
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 9:16 am
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
I also wonder whether these barons ever reply to the missives they receive from these people declaring themselves "in rebellion". One would hope their barons' committee has devised a template letter saying "sorry you've got it all wrong".
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Sorry I should be more clear.ArthurWankspittle wrote:That is Peter of England isn't it? Looks like the European tour is over.
From what I can gather about the PLD group, they keep referring to something that happened 16years ago when some Baron petitioned the queen over the treaty of Nice.
They seem to think lawful rebellion was invoked?
So In 2 years time when the UK leaves the EU that treaty won't be in force anymore and therefore how can they be in lawful rebellion?
Not that they ever have being!
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:58 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
When the time comes....
Odd how these peaceloving freethinkers so often hope for Robespierre's solution.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this, but has Margo caved in and paid up ?
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
SteveUK wrote:Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this, but has Margo caved in and paid up ?
That David Ronsinson who runs PLD is such a turn coat and a coward.
He first advised the lady to "get on her oath" as they can't lawful take land if your under oath or some BS.
When this wasn't working it was because she hadn't applied the procedure correctly (ok then!).
And lastly I noted a comment he made saying something along the lines of, I would not recommend paying as they will just set up a court and some other typical freeman crap.
Maybe this woman will come back down to earth now?
Then again....
-
- Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
- Posts: 8235
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
- Location: The Evergreen Playground
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Apparently so, and not with good grace. But be aware. She's still retaining the right to lawfully seize the land. Just not right now, very busy, but she'll get around to it. Eventually.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Certainly appears that way, looks like her last bare remnant of sanity crawled out from the dark reaches of her mind where it had been hiding and smacked her up the side of the head and told her that unless she wanted to be homeless she had best pay up. I wonder that these geniuses haven't figured out that Art 61 never applied to ANYONE but the King, but then again they haven't figured any of it out so small wonder.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
He's nothing but a stinking hypocrite, belly aching about how the current Government is both unlawful and is committing treason as it doesn't stand under article 61, but wants 'his' benefits paying in full and on time - nothing but a hypocritical parasite.JimUk1 wrote:
That David Ronsinson who runs PLD is such a turn coat and a coward.
He first advised the lady to "get on her oath" as they can't lawful take land if your under oath or some BS.
When this wasn't working it was because she hadn't applied the procedure correctly (ok then!).
And lastly I noted a comment he made saying something along the lines of, I would not recommend paying as they will just set up a court and some other typical freeman crap.
Maybe this woman will come back down to earth now?
Then again....
I'm in lawful rebellion but I'll accept your treasonous money!!
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
If only it had occurred to old man Crawford to do that.Burnaby49 wrote:Apparently so, and not with good grace. But be aware. She's still retaining the right to lawfully seize the land. Just not right now, very busy, but she'll get around to it. Eventually.
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Give him time, he'll get around to it.SteveUK wrote:If only it had occurred to old man Crawford to do that.Burnaby49 wrote:Apparently so, and not with good grace. But be aware. She's still retaining the right to lawfully seize the land. Just not right now, very busy, but she'll get around to it. Eventually.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this "stand(ing) under article 61" nonsense is.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:53 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
is that the Margo Carta 2017?SteveUK wrote:Perhaps I'm misunderstanding this, but has Margo caved in and paid up ?