"practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
It's like watching evolution . In reverse.
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Yeah, and it's not even a big step for a lot of them.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
You don't get 18 months for growing a dozen plants in your back yard for personal consumption or even personal consumption plus a bit to your mates to cover the costs. An 18 month sentence suggest either a very long previous history of production and/or intent to supply convictions, a history of convictions for some pretty serious offences or a commercial scale operation.aesmith wrote:Looks like the Magna Carta is letting someone down right now ..David Robotham
I was arrested and charged with the cultivation of cannabis and the intent to supply was dropped but i was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment and then after serving my sentence with then charged with the proceeds of crime for £19000, even though i never signed or was formally. Since then i have sworn my oath of allegiance and i now stand under article 61 of the magna Carta, i have send the courts, confiscation team and anyone else in connection with this case, although no one has responded to these. Saturday i received a letter telling me that if i do not start paying the £19000 which is rising at 8% per day or i will be sent back to prison for 9 months and then will still have to pay. I am unsure of my options and my next course of action as they seem to be disregarding the fact that i am now standing under article 61.
Using some back-of-a-fag-packet maths a £19,000 proceeds of crime decision suggests a 'harvest' of about 20kg and a single plant yields between 50 and 200g. Taking the middle figure of 100g that's 200 plants. A commercial grow by anybody's standards.
The fact he wasn't done for 'intent to supply' would be utterly irrelevant with those sort of figures, the fact it was being cultivated for distribution would be implicit unless he has one hell of a habit.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Anyone else spot the flaw in 'Scottish common law courts' master plan?
![Image](https://s3.postimg.org/ze4ula6n7/IMG_1790.jpg)
![bang head :brickwall:](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
![Image](https://s3.postimg.org/ze4ula6n7/IMG_1790.jpg)
![bang head :brickwall:](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
I'll be rich beyond my wildest dreams as soon as I get this transmuting lead into gold thing masteredSteveUK wrote:Anyone else spot the flaw in 'Scottish common law courts' master plan?
![Snicker :snicker:](./images/smilies/icon_snicker.gif)
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Think there was a link earlier in the thread to a news report that he was convicted of selling amphetamines !!longdog wrote:You don't get 18 months for growing a dozen plants in your back yard for personal consumption or even personal consumption plus a bit to your mates to cover the costs. An 18 month sentence suggest either a very long previous history of production and/or intent to supply convictions, a history of convictions for some pretty serious offences or a commercial scale operation.aesmith wrote:Looks like the Magna Carta is letting someone down right now ..David Robotham
I was arrested and charged with the cultivation of cannabis and the intent to supply was dropped but i was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment and then after serving my sentence with then charged with the proceeds of crime for £19000, even though i never signed or was formally. Since then i have sworn my oath of allegiance and i now stand under article 61 of the magna Carta, i have send the courts, confiscation team and anyone else in connection with this case, although no one has responded to these. Saturday i received a letter telling me that if i do not start paying the £19000 which is rising at 8% per day or i will be sent back to prison for 9 months and then will still have to pay. I am unsure of my options and my next course of action as they seem to be disregarding the fact that i am now standing under article 61.
Using some back-of-a-fag-packet maths a £19,000 proceeds of crime decision suggests a 'harvest' of about 20kg and a single plant yields between 50 and 200g. Taking the middle figure of 100g that's 200 plants. A commercial grow by anybody's standards.
The fact he wasn't done for 'intent to supply' would be utterly irrelevant with those sort of figures, the fact it was being cultivated for distribution would be implicit unless he has one hell of a habit.
This guy's got no chance, they'll already have a restriction on his property and will appoint a receiver to sell it for him!
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3755
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
I don't recall the "selling" bit but I think it was him that had a bag of them down his trousers.AndyPandy wrote:Think there was a link earlier in the thread to a news report that he was convicted of selling amphetamines !!
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Ah yes, how could I forget:ArthurWankspittle wrote:I don't recall the "selling" bit but I think it was him that had a bag of them down his trousers.AndyPandy wrote:Think there was a link earlier in the thread to a news report that he was convicted of selling amphetamines !!
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/local ... on-2101791
If it's the same guy, the sentence was 2009, can't be for the same offence.
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Why Longdog, you aren't possibly saying that our Mr Robotham is perish forfend playing fast and loose with the truth??? Why that would be unsovcit, unFOTL, unPLD'er....longdog wrote:You don't get 18 months for growing a dozen plants in your back yard for personal consumption or even personal consumption plus a bit to your mates to cover the costs. An 18 month sentence suggest either a very long previous history of production and/or intent to supply convictions, a history of convictions for some pretty serious offences or a commercial scale operation.aesmith wrote:Looks like the Magna Carta is letting someone down right now ..David Robotham
I was arrested and charged with the cultivation of cannabis and the intent to supply was dropped but i was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment and then after serving my sentence with then charged with the proceeds of crime for £19000, even though i never signed or was formally. Since then i have sworn my oath of allegiance and i now stand under article 61 of the magna Carta, i have send the courts, confiscation team and anyone else in connection with this case, although no one has responded to these. Saturday i received a letter telling me that if i do not start paying the £19000 which is rising at 8% per day or i will be sent back to prison for 9 months and then will still have to pay. I am unsure of my options and my next course of action as they seem to be disregarding the fact that i am now standing under article 61.
Using some back-of-a-fag-packet maths a £19,000 proceeds of crime decision suggests a 'harvest' of about 20kg and a single plant yields between 50 and 200g. Taking the middle figure of 100g that's 200 plants. A commercial grow by anybody's standards.
The fact he wasn't done for 'intent to supply' would be utterly irrelevant with those sort of figures, the fact it was being cultivated for distribution would be implicit unless he has one hell of a habit.
![Snicker :snicker:](./images/smilies/icon_snicker.gif)
![Snicker :snicker:](./images/smilies/icon_snicker.gif)
![Sarcasm :sarcasmon:](./images/smilies/SarcasmOn.gif)
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Their current recruiting poster. Better than anything Ken T could knock up.
![Image](https://s3.postimg.org/uoo3o5ueb/IMG_1796.jpg)
![Image](https://s3.postimg.org/uoo3o5ueb/IMG_1796.jpg)
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 9:29 pm
- Location: West Midlands, England
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
I can't remember when 'water rates' vanished and the water companies were privatised, but I am pretty sure I made some small change out if it.![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
-
- Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
- Location: The Evergreen Playground
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Thatcher did it in the 80's.Siegfried Shrink wrote:I can't remember when 'water rates' vanished and the water companies were privatised, but I am pretty sure I made some small change out if it.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Must be a misprint, I didn't see "benefits-not legal" on the poster ?
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 9:29 pm
- Location: West Midlands, England
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Yes, I remeber it now. Those were the days when even our familiy dog had shares in something or other. You had to be at least six people to make a decent profit, the way they were rationing out the shares.Burnaby49 wrote:
Thatcher did it in the 80's.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
It's actually a very good job. Professional, concise, compelling, and tells the reader what to do next (go to their website for more information).SteveUK wrote:Their current recruiting poster. Better than anything Ken T could knock up.
Of course, anyone going there will see that it's a load of shite, and the group is a bunch of bickering, juvenile layabouts. But I have to give them an A for marketing.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
How long are we giving Debbie Sherwood before she's arrested for non payment of Council Tax, she failed to attend commital proceedings on 21st July
Newlyn bailiffs rang me yesterday, he was very polite and asked would I answer some questions. I declined told him he had no powers, and I was busy as I was getting ready to go to hospital for an operation. I put the phone down. Today Cruella Deville rang at 08.15. I told her that l was standing in Lawful Rebellion and that I had put her MD on Notice and in future they were to contact me by post. She snorted that they didn't have to do this, that they had a court order against me and they intended to pursue this. I said well you do what you want, you have no powers anyway.
-
- Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
- Location: The Evergreen Playground
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
I would note that, as in Canada, your worthless freeloaders are quite happy to accept 'free' taxpayer funded medical benefits while doing their best not to contribute anything towards paying for them. Nothing highlights the totally shameless hypocrisy of our Canadian sovereign parasites more than their relentless demands for government services while pontificating how they are contributing to the greater good by exempting themselves from any responsibility for paying taxes to support them. They've opted out of that part of the equation. Keith Lawson, one of the most hypocritical, sanctimonious individuals I've ever met, argued in court at his tax evasion trial how it was his absolute right not to pay tax while it was shown that he is a huge consumer of medical services and is, in fact, only alive because of Canada's free medical. And he doesn't just accept it, he vehemently demands it as his right. A right funded by unenlightened taxpaying suckers like myself.AndyPandy wrote:How long are we giving Debbie Sherwood before she's arrested for non payment of Council Tax, she failed to attend commital proceedings on 21st July
Newlyn bailiffs rang me yesterday, he was very polite and asked would I answer some questions. I declined told him he had no powers, and I was busy as I was getting ready to go to hospital for an operation. I put the phone down. Today Cruella Deville rang at 08.15. I told her that l was standing in Lawful Rebellion and that I had put her MD on Notice and in future they were to contact me by post. She snorted that they didn't have to do this, that they had a court order against me and they intended to pursue this. I said well you do what you want, you have no powers anyway.
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=8223
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Sounds like a really charming and personable individual.AndyPandy wrote:How long are we giving Debbie Sherwood before she's arrested for non payment of Council Tax, she failed to attend commital proceedings on 21st July
Newlyn bailiffs rang me yesterday, he was very polite and asked would I answer some questions. I declined told him he had no powers, and I was busy as I was getting ready to go to hospital for an operation. I put the phone down. Today Cruella Deville rang at 08.15. I told her that l was standing in Lawful Rebellion and that I had put her MD on Notice and in future they were to contact me by post. She snorted that they didn't have to do this, that they had a court order against me and they intended to pursue this. I said well you do what you want, you have no powers anyway.
![Sarcasm :sarcasmon:](./images/smilies/SarcasmOn.gif)
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3755
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
No one on here is going to bet against her being wrong on this?Newlyn bailiffs rang me yesterday, he was very polite and asked would I answer some questions. I declined told him he had no powers, and I was busy as I was getting ready to go to hospital for an operation. I put the phone down. Today Cruella Deville rang at 08.15. I told her that l was standing in Lawful Rebellion and that I had put her MD on Notice and in future they were to contact me by post. She snorted that they didn't have to do this, that they had a court order against me and they intended to pursue this. I said well you do what you want, you have no powers anyway.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group
Nah, we're just waiting for the INEVITABLE when she is in fact hauled off to gaol by those bailiffs, etc, who "have no powers", after all she told them to "do what you want", sure sounds like tacit permission to me.ArthurWankspittle wrote:No one on here is going to bet against her being wrong on this?Newlyn bailiffs rang me yesterday, he was very polite and asked would I answer some questions. I declined told him he had no powers, and I was busy as I was getting ready to go to hospital for an operation. I put the phone down. Today Cruella Deville rang at 08.15. I told her that l was standing in Lawful Rebellion and that I had put her MD on Notice and in future they were to contact me by post. She snorted that they didn't have to do this, that they had a court order against me and they intended to pursue this. I said well you do what you want, you have no powers anyway.
![Snicker :snicker:](./images/smilies/icon_snicker.gif)
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.