She now wants witness protection as she is a whistle blower. She is completely barking with or without a whistle.

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
I always imagine the person on the other end of the phone doing this...Siegfried Shrink wrote:I find occasions where they engage normal people in crazy telephone conversations too cringe making to listen to.
Ved Chaudhari was live.
4 hrs ·
UPDATE at 13.07pm: Police Attended PC Wade 4118EA and PS Laura Smith 3192EA CAD 2839/25 Jan18: REF Equita documents threatening to steal my home, cars and property by force without court authority at 11am this morning 25 Jan 2018, EQUITA saying they will be removing cars EF55BCK and PK56MOF anytime after 8pm - this is to do with London Borough of Redbridge Council Tax Benefit Fraud and ESA and Housing Benefit Denial Frauds. Please BE ON ALERT TO come to 3 Peel Drive, Ilford Essex IG5 0JR TOMORROW to hold the Fraud Bailiff Thieves on Trial by Jury with 24 jurors if enough people are here (if they attempt to steal property). Police attended. There are SEVERAL CORRUPTION CLAIMS against the LONDON BOROUGH OF REDBRIDGE which must be INVESTIGATED FIRST TO STOP THE DAILY TERRORISM. EQUITA VIV NDHLOVU 07943841455 inform them its a Police matter CAD 2839/25 Jan 2018 and Court of Appeal ref Ellis V State 2017/3169
Ref 42755755 (Redbridge Council Tax no) Equita ref 20554093 Equita Tel 0844 561 8807 CEO Redbridge Council Andy Donald 0208 708 6000
And on and on and on....They came to evict me from my home forcibly, due to housing benefit denial frauds by the council, Redbridge council, which when Edward Ellis, equity lawyer, tried to serve them with his documents for corruption, of criminal cover-up of murders and firearms thefts by [name redacted] in the Romford County Court, organised criminal, convicted criminal, with at least 54 convictions, was occupying an office in the Romfort County Court as an immigration lawyer, and growing drugs on the farms in Sussex.
https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/ ... continues/Steved January 26, 2018 at 2:20 am
Old Edward is still at it?- wonder how long before they declare him a vexious litigant?
He has obviously not changed: from a judgment against him in 2008 against his suspension as a solicitor in 2006
“The substantive application came before Goldring J who observed that it was extremely difficult to follow and consisted, among other things, of allegations of corruption against the judiciary and very many others. He said that much of the application was wholly incomprehensible.”
(https://high-court-justice.vlex.co.uk/vid/-52629850)
He was finally struck off entirely in 2013
(http://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicit ... 04.article)
I suspect this is the one Neelu was babbling on about, she (amongst others) is mentioned
https://taylorspoliticalcolumn.files.wo ... tate-2.pdf
I think that Mr Goldring was right, and Edward certainly hasnt improved if this is evidence of his “filings”- “much of the application was wholly incomprehensible.” indeed
AKA totally without meritlongdog wrote:If she ever files this at court I foresee the word 'gibberish' being used liberally.
It'll remain to be seen if it ever even becomes an application. All we've seen so far is an incompletely completed form which contains little but gibberish. Anybody can produce something similar in minutes.Hercule Parrot wrote:Surprised that she isn't already on the vexatious litigants list. Maybe this application will fix that lacunae
I don't think I could do that....longdog wrote: All we've seen so far is an incompletely completed form which contains little but gibberish. Anybody can produce something similar in minutes.
I mighta, coulda before I quit smoking dope.Arthur Rubin wrote:I don't think I could do that....longdog wrote: All we've seen so far is an incompletely completed form which contains little but gibberish. Anybody can produce something similar in minutes.