
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/general-civ ... s-in-force
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Thanks, HWK. I always forget they publish separate lists for General and Extended orders. Doesn't seem sensible to me, but it's good to know she's on there. If the court is on its toes, her application should be routed to the designated judge for permission (and refused).He Who Knows wrote:Ah, but Neelu Berry IS on the list of civil restraint orders. Until July 2018![]()
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/general-civ ... s-in-force
Yes.The Seventh String wrote:Hang on. Isn’t it contempt of court for someone under a General CRO issued by the Queen’s Bench to make an application for proceedings in the Queen’s Bench while the Order is in force?
Yes, but in practice I think the Court office will just send the papers back to the applicant with a note advising that it cannot be accepted until permission has been given by the designated Judge. Or to save time, "the Designated Judge has considered your proposed application and declines to grant permission".The Seventh String wrote:Hang on. Isn’t it contempt of court for someone under a General CRO issued by the Queen’s Bench to make an application for proceedings in the Queen’s Bench while the Order is in force?
She might just be on to something the, I suspect her motivation is the dawning reality that she may shortly to be kicked out of house and home. I find it ironic that she might think her hated Local Authority (Redbridge) with which she has been at war eternally and which she does not recognise or contribute towards, financially, would have any obligations to her.OK I need researchers on this particular case, which was won on appeal in the Court of Appeal by Mr Haque, against Hackney Council, when the decision of Judge Luba was overturned for its failure to offer to provide proper housing to its resident.
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/4.html - it opens cans of worms whereby councils have a duty to house people which none of them are doing properly.
People who are looking to be rehoused to more suitable accommodation can quote this case to their Council Housing Departments where they are vulnerable or disabled or in cramped living conditions causing stress and depression.
The other case referred to http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2015/30.html
This rebuff punctures preconceived views and it's back to ranty CAPS LOCK stuff from Neelu;Mr Haque lost, the appeal made by HA was allowed.
I do love a good Neely rant, a Remedy of Errors.Thanks, you are right - so here we have the usual Local Government in bed with the judiciary, nothing new then? sorry guys, the laws are all man-made, so are the uniforms, wigs and robes, the entire pantomime does not work - so its an example of loads and loads of merry-go-rounds to put the Truth Needle in the Lie Haystack that the whole Legislative Law system is designed to DENY REMEDY TO THE HUMAN and GIVE REMEDY TO THE DEAD CORPORATION RUN ON COUNTERFEIT CURRENCY
She isn't happy about a man named Leachman who appears to have become involved in Neelu's life but its everyone else that feels the full force of Her Honour Mrs. Injustice Berry;FROM 7.4 billion people of Mother Earth
c/o Mrs Neelu Berry, 3 Peel Drive, Ilford Essex, IG5 0JR UK, 10 Feb 2018
TO
JCIO CEO, Chairman, Directors, Employees
inbox@judicialconduct.gov.uk, Ministry of Justice, Justice Ministers, Judicial Regulators, Judges, Councils
Ref: PUBLIC NOTICE TREASON CHARGE AGAINST ALL GOVERNMENTS - FOR FREE AND IMMEDIATE GLOBAL PUBLICATION
Criminal TREASON Charge against ALL GOVERNMENTS, Public Servants in Local & Central Government, CEO's, Directors, Chairmans, Judges, Judicial Regulators, Justice Ministers and all UK courts, including Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL and Court 37, Queens Bench Division
Please see below evidence of State Terrorism in which you are all hereby criminally charged with TREASON.
As usual, despite the sweeping grandiose nature of her world-wide injunction, the catalyst is, as usual, the more mundane and increasingly routine interactions with 'authority' in Neelu's every day life and other well-ground axes.No judge in the UK is signing any court Orders, there are no embossed seals, no oaths, no honour, resulting in a FREE FOR ALL for all organised criminals such as Romford County court Bailiffs to break entry, steal homes, without production of warrants, whilst the jurisdiction lies in other courts.
These criminals hire Corporate Assassination Companies such as Clearway Services, which broke entry and left my home unsecured to terrorise a vulnerable family, witnesses of Baby Murder in Redbridge Social Services.
So they are all removed from office. It's getting a bit repetitive and no less impotent than the first time she tried it.You are all charged with Treason and removed from public office for failure to serve and protect the public, for failure to maintain God's Laws thereby violating the Oath to God, which is TREASON.
That's quite an indictment. What should these miscreants, accused, convicted and sentenced without any due process whatsoever do next?As a result of your serial crimes, you have enslaved humanity with counterfeit currency, loans, jobs, interest, inflation and become Slave Masters and Mass Remedy Deniers.
I look forward to reading their confessions, mass resignations and asset-surrenders in the London Gazette.You are required to make Public Announcements of your Resignations, Surrender of all your assets from PROCEEDS OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY either by participation, Blinkers or ACQUIESCENCE
Can any legal beagles tell me if it is possible, in law to attempt to commit manslaughter?PLEASE SHARE!
Daily Terrorism from fake Bailiffs with no paperwork or paperwork from Organised Criminals sitting in Courts being used as shields by LOCAL COUNCILS to TERRORISE witnesses of State Crimes and Whistleblowers!
I gave my MP Wes Streeting, 7 days notice, 3 weeks ago to stop daily threats from EQUITA to break into my home due to Benefit Deinial Frauds, ESA Denial Frauds against FAMILY MEMBERS (causing Attempted Corporate Manslaughter)
Speaking as somebody with fairly well controlled bipolar disorder I wouldn't have thought Neelu was a member of the club. She's too consistently delusional with no signs of depression and her constant delusional state would be more the sort of thing you'd expect from schizophrenia although I don't think she has that either.exiledscouser wrote:Which brings me back to my first observation above, is this evidence of bi-polar behaviour? When my kids were about two they displayed similar behaviour.
Amateur analyses welcome!
Persecutory type: This delusion is a common subtype. It includes the belief that the person (or someone to whom the person is close) is being malevolently treated in some way. The patient may believe that he/she has been drugged, spied upon, harassed and so on and may seek "justice" by making police reports, taking court action or even acting violently.
Personally, I think she’s as mad as a box of frogs. That’s the technical diagnosis.longdog wrote:Speaking as somebody with fairly well controlled bipolar disorder I wouldn't have thought Neelu was a member of the club. She's too consistently delusional with no signs of depression and her constant delusional state would be more the sort of thing you'd expect from schizophrenia although I don't think she has that either.exiledscouser wrote:Which brings me back to my first observation above, is this evidence of bi-polar behaviour? When my kids were about two they displayed similar behaviour.
Amateur analyses welcome!
If I were to pick a technical term I'd go for plain old Delusional Disorder...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional_disorder
Persecutory type: This delusion is a common subtype. It includes the belief that the person (or someone to whom the person is close) is being malevolently treated in some way. The patient may believe that he/she has been drugged, spied upon, harassed and so on and may seek "justice" by making police reports, taking court action or even acting violently.
Wikipedia reports that in R. v Creamer [1966], 1 QB 72 at 81, 49 Cr App 368 at 378, CCA, a judge stated in dicta that an attempted manslaughter is "not an offence known to law."exiledscouser wrote: Can any legal beagles tell me if it is possible, in law to attempt to commit manslaughter?
So does this mean that I don't have to go to work tomorrow? I'll need to check, because Mr Bickersdyke is very strict about attendance and punctuality. Do you think Neelu could clarify that her order definitely applies to the Mass Remedy Deniers in the Stockport District Planning Dept?exiledscouser wrote:What else have "ALL GOVERNMENTS, Public Servants in Local & Central Government, CEO's, Directors, Chairmans, Judges, Judicial Regulators, Justice Ministers and all UK courts" committed?
That's quite an indictment. What should these miscreants, accused, convicted and sentenced without any due process whatsoever do next?As a result of your serial crimes, you have enslaved humanity with counterfeit currency, loans, jobs, interest, inflation and become Slave Masters and Mass Remedy Deniers.
You are required to make Public Announcements of your Resignations, Surrender of all your assets from PROCEEDS OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY either by participation, Blinkers or ACQUIESCENCE
Stockport Syndrome - it's wet, they are mad as hatters, brew beer and everywhere is uphill from the middle (unless sailing down the Mersey).exiledscouser wrote:You were probably in on it too from your con spiritual perch in lofty Stockport (where you suffer I don’t doubt from Stockport Syndrome).....
Ah, but Neelu refers to “attempted corporate manslaughter”. Corporate manslaughter, which is a statutory offence, being a quite different thing to plain, ordinary manslaughter, which is a common-law offence.Arthur Rubin wrote:Wikipedia reports that in R. v Creamer [1966], 1 QB 72 at 81, 49 Cr App 368 at 378, CCA, a judge stated in dicta that an attempted manslaughter is "not an offence known to law."exiledscouser wrote: Can any legal beagles tell me if it is possible, in law to attempt to commit manslaughter?
While Neelu-watching can make for some very entertaining moments I doubt she’s very entertaining to the public servants or any others who are on the receiving end of her tirades. This is a person who’s quite prepared to accuse local government staff, civil servants, MPs and their staff and anyone else of paedophilia, child slavery, child murder, Satanism, fraud and many other things on the phone or face to face then whack the whole thing on youtube complete with her target’s names and where they work.Siegfried Shrink wrote:I think Neelu is approaching National Treasure status for her contribution to the Gaiety of Nations with her contribution to the nationnal comedy.
I might agree if she accused random people of minor misfeasances within the bounds of credibility, but her accusations always seem to come as a bundle of everything she can think of, accusations which by their nature are not only fantastic but which would leave the accusee little time for anything else if true. No one would take her as a serious witness in a case of dropping litter, let alone anything more serious.The Seventh String wrote:
While Neelu-watching can make for some very entertaining moments I doubt she’s very entertaining to the public servants or any others who are on the receiving end of her tirades. This is a person who’s quite prepared to accuse local government staff, civil servants, MPs and their staff and anyone else of paedophilia, child slavery, child murder, Satanism, fraud and many other things on the phone or face to face then whack the whole thing on youtube complete with her target’s names and where they work.