Quatloos! > Tax
Scams > Tax
Protestors > EXHIBIT:
Tax Protestor Dummies 2 > Cases
("Damn, We Lost Again!
And why is it
that people who sell
tax protestor materials file their tax returns anyway . . .")
Cronic case of thinking you know.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:09:27 -0800 "Quatloos!" <email@example.com> writes:
Yeah, we both think not
know you're a wacko.
(We're both right.) What
have you refuted?
de·lu·sion (dī-l”¹zhen) noun
1. a. The
act or process of deluding. b. The state of being
false belief or opinion: labored under the delusion
that success was at hand.
3. Psychiatry. A
false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence,
Lose any more cases lately? Yeh,
the case for your sanity
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 9:45 PM
Subject: Fw: Fw: Re: For the "person" xxx
Say hello. You're in bed with Dennis Bernstein. A
tangent on PARKING METERS which you're sure to duck as far
as substance is concerned.
How does existing law get buried under the designed-for
functional illiteracy of the masses for most of a century?
Does it happen by accident? Why has the jury's role
been restricted against the common law standard of judging
the law as well as the facts? Who is out to harvest and channel
the functional illiteracy of the people? Can they do so not
with your aiding and abetting SILENCE?
When my appeal to the 2nd Appellate Court in California
is adjudicated you will be free to operate your non-commercial
conveyance without restriction on the streets and highways
of California. Existing law will be reaffirmed in the
California Constitution, the Motor Vehicle Act, court cases
all the way up to the California Supreme Court from 1914
through 1993. Be patient the truth will out.
Listen to www.trutradio.com
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:54:42 -0800 xxx> writes:
What is DENNIS B? / The KPFA vs Mary Francis Berrie
problem. / KPFA is a danger to liberty.
Dear Mr. Bernstein of K.P.F.A. Pacifica "Peoples" listener
sponsored radio, Berkeley;
Are you a totalitarian? Don't you believe in a pluralist
F.D.R. ordered the Army Manual destroyed. Hitler was
burning books. What was the difference? You utter "democracy" endlessly
but never "republic". At the same time you invoke
the Constitution for these United States and the Bill
of Rights. Where does that instrument authorize democracy?
F.D.R. was the Pied Piper who piped seduction to the
ears of the people for the Rothschilds, the Leobs, the Rochefellers,
Morgan, Mellon, the Warbergs et al.. Such an agent as F.D.R.
was sure to appear after our grandfathers/great grandfathers
permitted these families to begin kiting paper to the United
States in 1913.
Clinton was an F.D.R. wanta be. He gave us a trick
deal for timberlands, made our clean coal fields into a preserve
so we must buy from his far east political patron, we begin
to see the wonderful results of his trade agreements, he
never freed Leonard, he kissed us goodbye doing a trick deal
to get us to pay for his house in N.Y.
George W. is the next installment for democracy under bankruptcy, but
you will not be heard to advocate for pluralism.
Your adversity at the hands of Mary Francis Berrie is
understandable. You have no law. You are both commercial
players. You both have commercial values.
Mary plays the democracy card in step with its natural evolution
towards oligarchic dictatorship. You on the other hand are
deluded about the nature of democracy.
You Dennis B (as born) do not protest the foisting
upon you the military commercial persona designata DENNIS
BERNSTEIN. Were you ever taught English grammar? Every informed
of any legitimacy in the English language for ALL CAPS NAMES?
You accept DENNIS B upon your SS card, your driver
license, your bank statements (and maybe the State's birth
certificate for DB). In the military-commercial-tribunals
in Berkeley, Oakland and S.F. you readily answer to DENNIS
B not with question, not with peep, not with protest. If
you should commit murder you would be tried and executed
for violation of the terms of your presumed commercial contract
with the State. The Constitution borrowed from for certain
political and propaganda purposes would really have
nothing to do in essence with your trial and execution. For
all the breath and ink and benefit / consciousness raisers
expended on Mumia, the law for his trial is NEVER told.
You have Marxism under commercial bankruptcy rules
but apparently you either don't have enough of it or you
feel its it not being administered over us with the
right heart and spirit.
The system trusts you to keep KPFA listeners
in mushroom status respecting law. You will not disturb their
ears to remind them they are commercially regulated subjects
who have been declared enemies of the Untied States by the
great father figure F.D.R.
You have a system, you do not have law. You
appear to reject acquaintance to law as an alternative to
your discontents with the system. Bottom line is KPFAers
are soldiers and snitch artists for the system, and not for
a system under law but for a system over and above law.
Let me make my point. KPFA has demonstrated historically
that this is what it is and you each demonstrate this every
time you "drive." You're in lock step indoctrination
for the system outside of and beyond law.
Get a CaVehCode and reference together sections 260
and 21056. Doesn't say passenger vehicles are of a type required
to be registered does it? Who does the law apply to under
21056? Now what does 4000(a) really mean in para materia?
What does the term "person" mean in statures? ["natural
person"? "individual"? Are you so gullible
as to think those mean natural individual or natural man? "as
well as" = in the same manner as a corporation.]. Again,
what does "person" mean in 4000(a) in para
materia to 21056? Is a man employed by the State a "person" in
the manner of a corporation? Oh? is the State not a corporation? And
you boast that KPFA is not beholden to corporations.
Nonsense. You grovel to the biggest corporation everyday
in unquestioning unreasoned submission and by your silence
you preach over the airwaves the corporate line for the exceeding
its of lawful powers.
the branches, never ever ever at the root.
Here is a level you could start with
for introduction to truth, the everyday common place of
the PARKING METER. But your indoctrination screams
silence silence. No more e-mails you demand. Out
of sight out of mind you insist!
In January 1996 I was driven to rage by the tyranny
of the indoctrination that all private cars must be registered.
My 5th private car was stolen by the BPD leaving me facing
the ruin of my sign business (I had just spent my last $
getting 6600 Shattuck near La Pena ready to roll when my
car was stolen.). There is absolutely NO due process for
such theft. I had spent five or more years sharpening the
issue and with many attempts to get the commercial tribunals which
you insist on believing are
courts of law despite the military yellow fringed flags
that stare you in the face to recognize the law and
protect my right. All was to no avail.
I wrote a Public Inquiry to BPD Lyle L and Jess
Kelly the owner of Avenue Tow. In effect I said if you cannot
show me the law that authorized the towing and if you do
not return my car (showing the failure of courts to address
the law) would you not agree that we resort to the ancient
method of settling rights disputes by battle (in other words
that I would have a right to kill them for the trespass
just as horse thieves used to be killed). I faxed
copies of this to KPFA, KGO, KPIX, KTVU, the Chronicle, the
Tribune etc. etc. The big corporate media ignored it, but
not KPFA. KPFA, the groveler to the mother of corporations,
ran to the DA.
KPFA ignored everything in the fax. KPFA's thinking process
NEVER engaged. KPFA was oblivious to the 1st Amendment
import of my Public Inquiry. KPFA waddled into my court
trial for terrorist threats greeted and extolled as a community
hero and local treasure. KPFA the great watchdog of power
turned a blind eye to the fact that Julie Conger flat out
refused me representation and forced me to be my own attorney.
Just like the government, KPFA News indulges in avoidance
of the duty of inquiry. I was sentenced to 1 year in jail
and 3 years probation in disregard of what you imagine
to be a 5th Amendment unalienable due process right
Your indoctrination has you imagining that habeas
corpus is not suspended. Seven times I petitioned for habeas
corpus with a transcript of a page and a half showing Conger
refusing me the right to counsel. Seven times the petitions
were "denied". "Denied", do you understand
what that means? Not ruled upon, not considered, not
heard on the merits, but ignored. "Denied" means
ignored. Can you understand that? Do you know of any rule
of court, rule of procedure or any provision of law that
permits claim of right presented to a judiciary to be denied?
KPFA is a danger to liberty and to law. -JS
cc to Quake-on-the-loose another hopeless case.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:35:24 -0800 dennis b> writes:
TAKE ME OFF THIS LIST,
Just as I had suspected,
but a little early for Erie RR case and the U.C.C. Had
the interstate compact/alliance been formed by 1935?
I am going to place the
attached withe some of the cards at a community table in
the U.C. Theatre Berkeley. Do
you know of anyplace in your area that a display might
Oklahoma City News editor Carl
C. Magee files the first patent application for a parking
meter in December. He will be granted rights in 1936, 174
Dual Park-O-Meters will be installed in Oklahoma City in July
1935, 300 more will be ordered when their success
is demonstrated (police officers will have to explain that
no jackpots can be expected by those who deposit coins),
and meters of improved design will appear in streets of
major world cities in the next few decades.
[no parking meters in
London until 1958]
parking meter noun A
coin-operated device that registers the amount of time purchased for
the parking of a motor vehicle,
at the expiration of which the driver is
liable for a fine.
parked, park·ing, parks verb, transitive 1.
To put or leave (a vehicle) for a time in a certain location.
2. . 3. .4. .[Middle English, game preserve,
enclosed tract of land,
from Old French parc, of Germanic origin.]
pre·serve (prī-zūrv1) verb
pre·serves verb, transitive
1. 2. 3. To keep or maintain
intact: See Synonyms at DEFEND. 4. ... 5. ...6. To keep
or protect (game or fish) for one's private (revenue!
-JS) hunting or fishing.
verb, intransitive 1.
Noun 1..2. . 3. . 4.
Something considered as being the
exclusive province of certain persons: Ancient
Greek is the preserve of scholars.
[Middle English preserven, from Old French
Return to Tax Protestor Exhibit