Quatloos! > Tax
Scams > Tax
Protestors > EXHIBIT:
Tax Protestor Dummies 2 > Cases
("Damn, We Lost Again!
And why is it
that people who sell
tax protestor materials file their tax returns anyway . . .")
Really, you need that institution to justify your lie. I'm
not accommodating you. Law questions not medications are
Medication is not a defense against your liability for
mal pracrtice. So refute the evidence for the income tax
OR clean up your act. Need a martini?
Take your medication, please.
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: Say goodbye to Juno
You do have a hard on don't you. Afraid we'er depriving
you of taxpayers as a focus for your plunder lust. Get real
Mr. xxx. It is you who have rules to account for. Just who
may be liable to 200 fines in debt credit attestations to
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:40:10 -0800 "xxx, EA" <> writes:
It's a shame you cannot understand simple English. Now,
I've had to file a formal complaint with Juno. Would have
been nice if you had read their rules first, but apparently,
reading isn't one of your strong points.
Unsolicited Commercial E-mail
Juno accounts may not be used to send unsolicited advertisements for goods
or services of any kind, free or for profit. Furthermore, Juno accounts may
not be used as a "dropbox" or repository for responses to an unsolicited
advertisement (including, but not limited to, inquiries, complaints, unsubscribe
replies or bounced messages). Subscribers may be fined $200.00 for each day
this provision is violated. Full payment of fines will not prevent Juno from
terminating the offending account or seeking to obtain other legal remedies
against the responsible subscriber, including other damages or an injunction.
For information on Juno's efforts to combat unsolicited commercial e-mail
("spam") and links to independent spam-fighting organizations,
see our spam resources at http://help.juno.com/privacy/spam.html.
You may not use the Service to disseminate any e-mail message in a broad-based
mailing without Juno's prior consent. Whether a given mailing constitutes
a "mass mailing" is determined by Juno in its sole discretion,
based on criteria which may include the size of the message being sent and
the number of recipients. Any message sent to more than 50 e-mail addresses
simultaneously will typically be considered a mass mailing, and will not
Sending chain letters through the Service is prohibited.
Using your Juno account to participate in a pyramid scheme
is prohibited. Pyramid schemes are illegal operations in
which an e-mail recipient is encouraged to send money to
a list of several people, replace one name on the list with
his/her own, and forward the e-mail in bulk to others.
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Please remove me from your e-mail list
Certainly NOT. You have a fiduciary obligation to refute.
We contend that you lead people to pay taxes they do not
owe. We contend that by this information which you have acknowledged
receiving that your future customers, if you continue in
your current course, will have cause of action against you.
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:02:51 -0800 "xxx, EA" writes:
I do not care to read your unsolicited mail. Please remove
me from your list.
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 11:40 AM
Subject: OPPORTUNITY IN THE WAR FOR MEN'S MINDS
OPPORTUNITY IN THE WAR FOR MEN'S MINDS. If the foundations
be destroyed what can the righteous do? The foundations are
destroyed thought hypnotic indoctrination of the American
people into a false belief system. I believe that use by
the law informed of the right to petition affords us a basis
for repairing the foundations. This is a start. Much more
can be done.
More than our position, our evidence is now before the Government
and the media. For those of us with the industry to be persistent
at the gate of the corporate media we now have a basis to
assert our claims. They can no longer dismiss us with the
contention "those arguments have been rejected by the
courts." The validity of the courts is now in serious
question. Our position can be "the courts be damned,
does not the Government have a 9th Commandment duty to tell
us the truth? Is not popularized misconception for the term
United States the basis for the most widespread fraud in
the history of the world? Do not both the Government and
the media have a duty to acknowledge cant and subterfuge" Does
the media have an obligation to expose deception (especially
user subscription media). Is there not a contract duty to
allow the truth to be exposed? Has a democratic election
voted the doctrine of correct words and phrases out of existence?
There is more evidence here than many freedom lovers care
to admit to. Anyone can focus on any aspect of interest to
him or upon which he feels competent to sustain advocacy.
[For sure the media will not draw in more than what you present.
I feel that material will allow you to support an argument
for whatever level of deprogramming may be your current center
I suggest that you in other parts of the country give serious
thought to the California problem. If enough momentum is
put behind this more than century old disability, it may
afford the whole county a wedge to discredit and hopefully
to undo: 1) the income tax, 2) democracy, that sacred cow,
the 17th Amendment, 3) the 14th Amendment and slave citizenship,
4) international treaties., 5) the federal reserve act (have
you heard of non fractional reserve digital gold?).
Does anyone know of a web site where the documents can
be easily posted for reference and downloading? If you do
please give me careful instructions. -JS
The evidence is now before two San Francisco Talk Radio
stations. Here are names and suggestions. Please spread the
word. If you supply me e-mail addresses I can serve media
throughout the country.
Suggested Talk Show Topics:
Withholding ($) at the workplace is about to be confirmed
to be voluntary. Get the message across that the volunteering
CREATES the tax, that it is volunteering to make a gift to
the Federal Government.
Are the United States District Courts lawfully established?
[Are most published tax protestor cases void and a propaganda
front for the Government?]
Is the California DRIVER LICENSE scheme void across the
board? Even for commercial users? [Or any other aspect that
can be derived from the current DMV default to our inquiry.
The application for DR IC is not legally binding unless evidence
of permission granted exists in the DM]
Does California's abdication of dejure status on 01-01-1873
void Amendments 16 - 26?
Can use of debt credit (FRNs, "checks") be required
for common carrier service (Pacific Bell and CPUC)? [Can
we use our political strength as individuals to cause communications
companies to push for an honest money system? Has anyone
seen the piece that advocates for digital gold (not fractional
reserve!) on the site corresponding to email@example.com,firstname.lastname@example.org]
Is the Mark of the Beast without legal substance? Is the
Social Security number contract performed by the SSA or is
there appearance of contract only? [The damned # is a custom
convenience for identification only and confers NO jurisdiction
upon the Federal Government]
http://www.kgoam810.com/ for the following who all have
todays notice and attachments on their e-mail.
If you are out of area you may use KGO's web site to phone
via the Internet.
for KSFO San Francisco the following were provided the e-mail
text via the on line e-mail and were invited to reply in
order fot the attachments to be send by counter reply. None
have replied as of this morning.
Lee Rogers, Limbaugh, M Savage, Wilson, Metcalf, Drudge
[Most of these have 800# listed on the site. Others can be
directed to me to be provided the material AS CAN ANY TALK
SHOIW HOST IN THE COUNTRY]
email@example.com This failed. I have just inquired via
CNN web cite e-mail for King's e-mail. I may get it if Ask
Greta CNN has not spread the word that truth is on the loose.
REPEAT OF THIS MORNING'S E-MAIL (FOR THE ATTACHMENTS) WHICH
YOU HAVE RECEIVED:
National Archives and Records Administration: Please see
the last page of A -2 DOT ...
Attention CLINTON, BUSH, RENO, FEINSTEIN, BOXER, B LEE,
JUDGE MARYLN HALL PATEL, CNN, and QUATLOOS (Fraud Protector
This is the electronic counterpart to the hard copy formal (attachments) notice
of the legal disability of the STATE OF CALIFORNIA
and of the suspected legal disability of the UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURTS within the 50 states of the union.
The insurgency / defection of California government since 01-01-1873 is no
longer a private secret in Sacramento and in Washington. For over two weeks
now these facts are common knowledge in the public sector. The American people
await your explanation and your plan of action. The American people will
have just cause for rage if you give this matter the silent treatment. Americans
may have cause to recall that hanging is the penalty for treason.
The State of California was unlawfully counted in the ratification
process and the 16th Amendment is void for never having been
presented to the lawful State of California. The United States
was under disability to present Amendments 16 - 26 for its
ongoing failure to comply with IV, 4 for California state.
Accordingly 26 USC §1 et. seq. is not law in that the
States were not involved in the enactment (The 17th Amendment
in addition to not being law is in conflict with the Constitution
for the United States and California was otherwise excluded
Superior tribunal, County of Alameda "criminal" proceeding
No. 131499 proves there are no State government judges in
California, indeed the events of 1871-1873 show that no State
Unless you respond to these very important concerns by February
19, 2001, your answer to be taken by tacit procuration will
be that you recognize the right and the necessity for the
people to form natural law/common law courts, that you will
be subject to their process and that you (the United States)
will be bound by their judgments and decrees.
QUATLOOS has responded > "Visit our Stupid Tax Protestor
Tricks Exhibit at http://www.quatloos.com/taxscams/cm-taxpr.htm" Quatloos
has gone into hiding .. after issuing this series of retorts
to A -2 DOT... sent them two days ago:
"Man, I'd love to be around when they receive this.
Talk about busting a gut laughing! Anybody object if I start
a collection of these things for our website --they would
be an instant hit? Are they copyrighted?
"When you'uns start asking sensible questions, we will
start supplying sensible answers. As it 'tis, the questions
you are putting forth -- and the bizarre and incorrect language
used to frame those questions --> would get you snickered
out of any political science course."
Oh man, this is hilarious! Where do you come up with terms
like "they sayers"?
[Julian: Swig to Quatloos: Can you claim to be a fraud buster
if you are at essence a they sayer? The they sayers in question
are the American people expressing not their beliefs or impressions
but their political will in the form of lawful contract.
What does the term face value mean to you?]
Plain and simple the Quatloos site is a fraud protection
racket. Quatloos knows that the USDC tax decisions it posts
are "denial" "rejection" matters NOT
RULINGS, but are straight out cant exploiting the functional
illiteracy of the dumber down American people. Quartos now
reveals the character of its allegiance to truth. Being shown
that the legal basis for the US Courts upon which the tax
protestor component of its site depends for its long standing
portrayal of the U.S. income tax is highly doubtful, Quartos
responds with the above derision and then retreats.
Quartos reveals many genuine frauds and scams on its site
so as to play it for context. By this juxtaposition the public
believes the Tax Protestor pages under Quatloos are likewise
valid revelations. Quatloos now gives rise to questions:
what is its purpose in maintaining its site? who are its
One reply upon the matter: "Julian,You must be doing
something right! You've attracted the Damage Control team
from the Banksters' Goon Squad."
Quatloos. You have now read this. Come forth and discredit
the assertions of the attachments on their merits where and
when you can. It is one thing to deride, it is anther to
Your offer is accepted. You may post all of the attachments
(but only in their entirety) and you may post the response
that may come from the best legal minds in government.
This is sent in 3 or more e-mails due to limitations imposed
The CA DMV is in default to the matters 4 Legis and 5 Legis.
The default will be memorialized within a week. If with-the-feet-testimony
continues upon the memorialization, the State of CA's answers
will then be formalized by taking them by process of tacit
If this overcrowds the capacity on any of your boxes, I
apologize. If you desire the attachments I can send them
in smaller segments.
Return to Tax Protestor Exhibit