Scams & Frauds Exposed

Spam Free

Financial & Tax Fraud
Education Associates, Inc.

A Non-Profit Corporation

Quatloos! > Tax Scams > Tax Protestors > EXHIBIT: Tax Protestor Dummies 2 > Cases

Tax Protestor Cases Exhibit
("Damn, We Lost Again! And why is it that people who sell
tax protestor materials file
their tax returns anyway . . .")

No mans life, liberty, or property is safe as long as the legislature is in session.-Lysander Spooner

xxx wrote:

 Quatloos: You are still ducking the question, it is copied in here again, which of the four locations named in Rule 54(c) was the San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas USDC in/on?

 Seems pretty straight forward to me.

 You have a 25 percent chance even if you guess.

 Try it, it won't hurt, I promise.

 As for the case law put forth, the truth is, the Defendant never put forth a claim on which the court could grant relief, no problem. But the court just wanted to add to the public disinformation and not tell the truth.

 Surely you can understand that when only 15 percent of the cases are reported, the government is going to see that there are not any cases to help the "common herd", you can see that can't you?

 You see, the basis for the common law and the commercial law is fairness and good faith dealing, absent in any of the courts today.

 But, you only have to answer one question, above listed.


 Because the authority of Congress to act has NEVER been limited to the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, etc. This is yet another lie by your group of idiots. Go read the Constitution and the Federalist Papers and you might (though I doubt it, your collective IQ is in double digits) be able to pull your heads out of your respective arses.

 Oh, and thanks for keeping us on your mailing list. We truly enjoy the opportunity to de-bunk your lies. We've had indications that our responses are being _w_i_d_e_l_y_ distributed across the internet, and that such support as you (fraudulently) hoped to build is backfiring in a massive way. And now for those interested in THE TRUTH, see case which follows:


 Julian: The real question is, "On the other hand, since all Federal crimes are statutory and all criminal prosecutions in the Federal courts are based on acts of Congress,..." Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 26, Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules, para 2. And Rule 54(a), "These rules apply to all criminal prosecutions in the United States District Courts;..." And Rule 54(c) Application of Terms. As used in these rules the following terms have the designated meanings. "Act of Congress" includes any act of Congress locally applicable to and in force in the District of Columbia, in Puerto Rico, in a territory or in an insular possession." The question is: On which of the four locations named in Rule 54(c) Act of Congress is the United States District Court in San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, situated on/in? Julian: "Quatloos" cannot answer the question, he doesn't know. But let's see. These quotes are from the government's own rules and the question is a fair question based on the definitions quoted.

Return to Tax Protestor Exhibit

Have a question for Quatloos?


Tax Protestors, Pure Trusts, and Other Stupid De-Tax Schemes & Scams
Have a stupid theory why you shouldn't have to pay taxes? 861? Non-Filer? Sovereign Citizen? Believe that the federal courts are actually admiralty courts or that the only real citizens of the USA live in Puerto Rico, Guam, and the District of Columbia, then this forum is for you.

Support Quatloos


© 2002- by Quatloosia Publishing LLC.. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be reprinted in whole or in part without the express, written permission of Financial & Tax Fraud Associates, Inc. This site is Legal issues should be faxed to (877) 698-0678. Our attorneys are Grobaty & Pitet LLP ( and Riser Adkisson LLP (

Asset Protection Book Accounts Receivable Financing Equity Indexed Annuities Lost Eye Book Lost Eye Book

Equistrip - Business assets financing

Lost Eye

Website designed and maintained by John Barrick

www Quatloos!