Quatloos! > Tax
Scams > Tax
Protestors > EXHIBIT:
Tax Protestor Dummies > Schiff
("Damn, We Lost Again! And why is
it that people who sell
tax protestor materials file their tax returns anyway . . .")
Schiff v. Cox, 915 F.2d 1565 (4th Cir. 09/28/1990)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
decided: September 28, 1990.
IRWIN A. SCHIFF, PETITIONER - APPELLANT,
LARRY COX, RESPONDENT - APPELLEE
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Chief District Judge. No. CA-89-202-E.
Irwin A. Schiff, Appellant Pro Se.
Lisa Ann Grimes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Elkins, West Virginia,
Sprouse and Wilkins, Circuit Judges, and Butzner, Senior Circuit Judge.
Author: Per Curiam
Irwin A. Schiff appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus
relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Our review of the record and the
district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.*fn* Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Schiff v. Cox, CA-89-202-E
(N.D.W. Va. June 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
*fn* Schiff can exhaust his administrative remedies by pursuing a belated
appeal to the National Appeals Board. See United States Parole Commission Rule
to Tax Protestor Exhibit