Quatloos! > Tax Scams > Tax Protestors > EXHIBIT: Tax Protestor Dummies > Schiff v Cox

Tax Protestor Cases Exhibit
("Damn, We Lost Again! And why is it that people who sell
tax protestor materials file their tax returns anyway . . .")

Schiff v. Cox, 915 F.2d 1565 (4th Cir. 09/28/1990)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 90-6349

decided: September 28, 1990.

IRWIN A. SCHIFF, PETITIONER - APPELLANT,

v.

LARRY COX, RESPONDENT - APPELLEE

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Chief District Judge. No. CA-89-202-E.

Irwin A. Schiff, Appellant Pro Se.

Lisa Ann Grimes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Sprouse and Wilkins, Circuit Judges, and Butzner, Senior Circuit Judge.

Author: Per Curiam

Irwin A. Schiff appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.*fn* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Schiff v. Cox, CA-89-202-E (N.D.W. Va. June 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Disposition

AFFIRMED

Opinion Footnotes

*fn* Schiff can exhaust his administrative remedies by pursuing a belated appeal to the National Appeals Board. See United States Parole Commission Rule 2.26-10.

Return to Tax Protestor Exhibit